SCIEPublish

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Construction Materials for Drywall Application: Plastic Waste and Natural Fiber Composite Versus Conventional Gypsum Board

Article Open Access

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Construction Materials for Drywall Application: Plastic Waste and Natural Fiber Composite Versus Conventional Gypsum Board

Author Information
1
Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ 24210-240, Brazil
2
Packaging Technology Center (CETEA), Institute of Food Technology (ITAL), Avenida Brasil 2880, Jd. Chapadão, Campinas, SP 13070-178, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 29 December 2025 Revised: 15 April 2026 Accepted: 22 May 2026 Published: 05 June 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:4
Downloads:1
Adv. Mat. Sustain. Manuf. 2026, 3(2), 10010; DOI: 10.70322/amsm.2026.10010
ABSTRACT: Metallized biaxially oriented polypropylene (met-BOPP) is a flexible packaging material whose aluminium layer hinders mechanical recycling. This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a met-BOPP composite reinforced with cellulosic fibers, comparing its environmental performance to that of gypsum plasterboard, a conventional material widely used in drywall systems. The functional unit was defined as the production of 1 m2 of board. Primary data were obtained experimentally, and secondary data were sourced from the Ecoinvent 3.6 database, using OpenLCA 2.5 software and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) impact assessment method. The results revealed substantially lower potential environmental impacts for the composite board compared to the gypsum plasterboard across several categories, with net environmental credits equivalent to 208% of the gypsum impact in Global Warming Potential, 460% in Marine Ecotoxicity, and 207% in Non-carcinogenic Human Toxicity. The environmental gains of the composite alternative result from the recycling of the post-consumer plastic waste used. A sensitivity analysis using a pure cut-off modelling, in which the met-BOPP waste enters the system burden-free and no valorization credits are granted, confirmed the environmental advantage of the composite in terms of GWP, showing a 90.8% reduction in GWP compared with gypsum plasterboard. These findings support met-BOPP composite panels as a promising low-carbon alternative for the construction sector, aligned with circular economy principles.
Keywords: Composite; Natural fiber; Plastic waste; Polypropylene bioriented; Met-BOPP; Drywall; LCA; Construction sector
TOP