ABSTRACT:
Cellular communication network factor 2 (CCN2,
formerly known as ‘connective tissue growth factor’ or ‘CTGF’) was the subject
of anti-fibrotic drug development programs, largely in FibroGen, starting in
the mid-1990s. This led to the development of FG-3019 (pamrevlumab) as a lead
drug that was used initially to target diabetic nephropathy and subsequently
pancreatic cancer, pulmonary fibrosis and Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. All
these programs failed clinically; diabetes in early development, and the others
at Phase III. Could these failures have been anticipated? Is ‘CTGF’ dead as an
anti-fibrotic target? What might have been done differently or could be done
differently in the future? This personal commentary—based on years of
experience first at FibroGen working on the ‘CTGF’ program and then as an
independent academic researcher---aims to address at least some of these
issues.
Cite This Article
SCIEPublish Style
Leask A. Is “CTGF” Still a Viable Anti-Fibrotic Target?. Fibrosis2025, 3, 10010. https://doi.org/10.70322/fibrosis.2025.10010
AMA Style
Leask A. Is “CTGF” Still a Viable Anti-Fibrotic Target?. Fibrosis. 2025; 3(3):10010. https://doi.org/10.70322/fibrosis.2025.10010