SCIEPublish

In Search of Evidence for Impact on De-Institutionalization: A Systematic Review of the Current Status, Gaps and Future Directions of Translatable Mental Health Research on Alternative Care

Review Open Access

In Search of Evidence for Impact on De-Institutionalization: A Systematic Review of the Current Status, Gaps and Future Directions of Translatable Mental Health Research on Alternative Care

Author Information
1
Facultad de Psicología y Humanidades, Universidad San Sebastián, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
2
William James Center for Research, ISPA University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal
3
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL—University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 08 May 2026 Revised: 08 July 2026 Accepted: 10 August 2026 Published: 14 August 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:10
Downloads:6
Lifespan Dev. Ment. Health 2026, 2(3), 10018; DOI: 10.70322/ldmh.2026.10018
ABSTRACT: The transition from institutionalized care to alternative family-based care arrangements for children and youth without available parents is an important policy aim around the world. To document evidence on de-institutionalization (DI) and identify gaps that are stalling the translation of DI findings into policy or practice, we conducted a systematic scoping review of studies on de-institutionalization published in the last five years. Our systematic search identified 221 pertinent studies covering 67 countries across most continents. The majority of the studies were qualitative, used some type of ‘convenience’ sampling, and had a modest number of participants (but with a broad range, 1–5351). Remarkably few studies included children under 6 years of age. Despite small samples and relatively weak designs, the majority of the studies suggested policy implications of their results. We discuss the gaps in DI research, stressing the need for transparency and replicability, paying attention to the specific circumstances of performing DI research. To overcome these gaps, we suggt that DI studies create more replicable evidence with translatable impact for governments, policymakers, sponsors, and practitioners. Vulnerable children and their (alternative) parents deserve family-based DI reform that is sustainable and successful in improving their lives.
Keywords: Orphanage; Family-based care; Street children; Care reform; Group care; Replicability; Translation
TOP