Transformative Practices: Rights of Nature and the Good Life

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 October 2025.

Guest Editor (1)

Stefan  Knauß
Dr. Stefan Knauß 
Just Transition Center, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
Interests: Environmental Ethics; Governance and Values of Nature; Rights of Nature

Co-Guest Editors (6)

Klaus  Bosselmann
Prof. Dr. Klaus Bosselmann 
Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Interests: Global Environmental Law; Constitutionalism; Legal Theory
Andreas  Gutmann
Dr. Andreas Gutmann 
Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, Kassel, Hessen, Germany
Interests: Rights of Nature; Extractivism; Latin American Constitutionalism; Postcolonial Legal Theory; Administrative Law
André  Kahl
Dr. André Kahl 
Institute for Political Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
Interests: Political Theory and Intellectual History; Environmental Ethics; Rights of Nature
Jenny García  Ruales
Dr. Jenny García Ruales 
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, AAdvokatenweg 36, 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany
Interests: Legal Environmental Anthropology; Constitutional Anthropology; Decolonial Comparative Law & Knowledge; Indigenous Ecologies in the Amazon; Indigenous Jurisprudence; Rights of Nature/Multi-species Justice; Collaborative & Co-Creative Research
Janina  Reimann
Dr. Janina Reimann 
Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, Kassel, Hessen, Germany
Interests: Rights of Nature, Indigenous Rights, Biocultural Rights
Tim  Williams
Dr. Tim Williams 
Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Interests: Ecological law; conservation law; resource management; rights of nature

Special Issue Information

The Rights of Nature (RoN) represent an innovative approach to environmental governance by granting legal rights to natural entities. Rooted in Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK), particularly in Latin America, RoN challenge the human-nature dichotomy by emphasizing relational worldviews based on care and responsibility. These rights significantly transform legal and societal frameworks, promoting a deeper connection between humans and nature beyond sustainability principles. Resonant self- and social-relations, which acknowledge nature’s intrinsic and relational value, are crucial for fostering transformative change.

This special issue examines RoN as a transformative practice, analyzing the social factors enabling significant shifts in nature governance. It explores not only the human-nature relationships within these legal frameworks but also the self- and social-relations of involved communities and actors. By emphasizing transformative capacities, the issue provides insights into how RoN can reshape governance in specific contexts.
The research is grounded in interdisciplinary studies on transformative change, arguing that effective nature protection arises when nature is valued intrinsically, relationally, and not merely for its utility. The central research question asks: What transformative self-, social-, and nature-relations underlie successful local initiatives for establishing and applying the Rights of Nature?

Published Papers (3 Papers)

Open Access

Editorial

17 March 2025

The Roots of Rights—Special Issue: “Transformative Practices: Rights of Nature and the Good Life”

This special issue focuses on the social practices of Rights of Nature (RoN), specifically exploring the transformative competencies and skills involved. The research investigates both individual competencies, such as resilience, mindfulness, and creativity, and collective skills, like relationship building and sustainable forms of interaction with the social and the ecological environment. The central question is if RoN does include “best practice” examples of cultivating non-instrumental relationships with the self, the social other, and the natural other.

Stefan  Knauß*
André  Kahl
Jenny García Ruales
Andreas  Gutmann
Janina  Reimann
Tim  Williams
Klaus  Bosselmann
Ecol. Civiliz.
2025,
2
(2), 10004; 
Open Access

Article

07 August 2025

Daoism, Confucianism, and the Rights of Nature: Transformative Relations in Ecological Governance

Confronting a global ecological crisis, this paper argues that conventional anthropocentric governance models, rooted in instrumental rationality, are inadequate. Drawing on Edoardo Ongaro’s concept of an integrative approach to an ontological and political philosophical understanding of public governance and administration, it proposes a relational framework for ecological governance by integrating the Rights of Nature (RoN) movement with classical Chinese philosophical traditions. The study emphasizes the complementary foundations offered by Daoism, specifically its concepts of ziran (natural spontaneity) and wuwei (non-coercive action) which support decentralized governance aligned with ecological self-organization, and Confucianism, particularly tian ren he yi (unity of heaven and humanity), which embeds ecological stewardship within moral self-cultivation (ren) and social duty (li). Comparative case studies highlight cultural complexities in implementing such relational governance. This paper outlines a tripartite pathway for building transformative capacities within this relational framework and discusses policy implications.

Ge Xin
Shinan Hao*
Ecol. Civiliz.
2025,
2
(4), 10013; 
Open Access

Review

23 October 2025

Unpacking the Transformative Power of the Rights of Nature: Rethinking Self, Society, and Nature in Environmental Governance in Tanzania

This study examines the transformative potential of integrating the Rights of Nature (RoN) into Tanzania’s environmental governance framework to address persistent ecological degradation, legal marginalization of local communities, and systemic governance gaps. Despite global progress in adopting the Rights of Nature (RoN), where ecosystems are granted legal personhood and communities serve as guardians Tanzania’s legal and institutional frameworks remain predominantly anthropocentric, lacking provisions that recognize nature’s intrinsic value. The primary objective of the study was to critically evaluate the extent to which Tanzania’s current governance systems reflect or exclude RoN principles and to propose transformative pathways grounded in justice, inclusivity, and local knowledge. The study analyzed international legal instruments, Tanzanian statutes, scholarly literature, and case studies using a doctrinal and thematic review methodology. Findings reveal that, despite Tanzania’s comprehensive environmental legislation, such as the Environmental Management Act (2004), key provisions fail to ensure procedural justice and exclude communities from meaningful participation, particularly under Strategic Environmental Assessment regulations. Conversely, local and Indigenous communities such as the Maasai, Chagga, and Zaramo have long practiced ecological stewardship grounded in relational worldviews, echoing RoN values. However, these systems are neither legally recognized nor institutionalized. The study concludes that a shift towards rights-based and transformative governance is necessary to address environmental injustice and ecological decline. It recommends revising legal frameworks to grant ecosystem rights, mandating participatory governance, and embedding Indigenous and local knowledge into environmental policy. Such reforms will not only enhance ecological integrity and local empowerment but also contribute to achieving Tanzania’s commitments under Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 13, 15, and 16.

Brown  Gwambene*
Halima  Miigo
Ecol. Civiliz.
2026,
3
(1), 10018; 
TOP