SCIEPublish

Genetic Strategies for Labeling AT2 Cells in Murine Lung via Abca3 and Etv5-Driven Reporters

Article Open Access

Genetic Strategies for Labeling AT2 Cells in Murine Lung via Abca3 and Etv5-Driven Reporters

1
Women’s Guild Lung Institute, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 22 November 2025 Revised: 12 December 2025 Accepted: 02 February 2026 Published: 06 February 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:168
Downloads:236
J. Respir. Biol. Transl. Med. 2026, 3(1), 10002; DOI: 10.70322/jrbtm.2026.10002
ABSTRACT: Precise labeling of alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells is essential for elucidating lung development and injury responses. In this study, we evaluated Abca3 and Etv5-based genetic strategies for labeling AT2 cells in murine models. Using targeted genetic approaches, we generated Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA knock-in mouse lines and crossed them with pTRE-H2BGFP to create inducible reporter models driven by Abca3 or Etv5. Labeling specificity and efficiency were assessed by flow cytometry and co-immunostaining. Our results show that both Abca3 and Etv5 strategies faithfully label AT2 cells across developmental stages and following lung injury. Comprehensive analyses confirmed the high specificity and efficiency of labeling. These Abca3- and Etv5-driven systems offer robust tools for investigating AT2 cell biology and pathology and may serve as effective drivers for tetO-mediated gene knockout or overexpression studies specifically in AT2 cells in mouse models.
Keywords: Alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells; Abca3; Etv5; Lung development; Bleomycin injury

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alveolar type 2 (AT2) epithelial cells play a central role in maintaining lung homeostasis, repair, and regeneration. These cuboidal cells are responsible for synthesizing and secreting pulmonary surfactant, a lipoprotein complex that reduces surface tension and prevents alveolar collapse during respiration [1]. Beyond their classical function in surfactant production, AT2 cells serve as progenitor cells for the alveolar epithelium, capable of self-renewal and differentiation into alveolar type 1 (AT1) cells following injury [2]. Their ability to replenish the alveolar lining after damage positions them as critical mediators of lung repair [3]. Dysregulation of AT2 cell function contributes to a variety of pulmonary diseases, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [4], idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [3], and certain forms of lung cancer [5]. Thus, precise identification and manipulation of AT2 cells are essential for understanding the mechanisms that govern lung development, injury responses, and disease progression.

To investigate AT2 cell biology in vivo, lineage tracing and cell-specific gene manipulation strategies rely heavily on the availability of accurate genetic drivers. Traditional AT2 cell labeling approaches have utilized promoters such as Sftpc (surfactant protein C) [6,7,8] to drive reporter or recombinase expression. Among these, Sftpc-Cre [8] and Sftpc-rtTA [6] mouse lines have been widely used to target AT2 cells due to the selective expression of surfactant protein C. However, these lines are not without limitations. Some Sftpc-based models exhibit ectopic activity in non-AT2 cell types, including distal airway progenitors [7,9], and may show developmental-stage–dependent variability in expression. In addition, continuous or high-level Sftpc-driven recombinase activity can lead to off-target effects or perturbations in AT2 cell physiology [10,11,12], complicating the interpretation of experimental results. Therefore, identifying alternative promoters that more precisely and consistently label AT2 cells remains a critical need in lung research.

Recent transcriptomic and epigenetic studies have revealed Abca3 (ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 3) and Etv5 (ETS variant transcription factor 5) as highly specific markers of mature AT2 cells. Abca3 is a key regulator of lamellar body biogenesis and surfactant lipid transport [13,14], with loss-of-function mutations linked to neonatal respiratory failure [15] and interstitial lung disease in children [16]. Etv5, a transcription factor downstream of FGF signaling, is essential for maintaining AT2 cell identity and preventing trans-differentiation into AT1 cells [17]. Both genes are expressed robustly and specifically in AT2 cells throughout development and adulthood, making them promising candidates for generating new genetic labeling tools.

In this study, we developed Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA knock-in mouse lines and crossed them with pTRE-H2BGFP to create inducible, lineage-specific reporter models. Using flow cytometry and co-immunostaining, we demonstrate that these strategies enable efficient and specific labeling of AT2 cells during various developmental stages and after lung injury. The Abca3- and Etv5-driven systems not only provide reliable models for tracking and isolating AT2 cells but also offer valuable platforms for conditional gene manipulation through tetO-mediated knockout or overexpression approaches. These new genetic tools expand the repertoire of AT2-specific drivers and will facilitate more precise studies of alveolar epithelial cell biology in health and disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Generation of Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA Knock-In Mouse Lines

To develop inducible and AT2-specific reporter models, we generated Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA knock-in mouse lines using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing (Biocytogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The design of targeting constructs was guided by transcriptomic data and by previous studies that identified Abca3 and Etv5 as robust AT2-specific markers. For Abca3-rtTA knock-in, an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) followed by the reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator (rtTA) cassette was targeted into the junction region of the last coding exon and 3′UTR of mouse Abca3 via sgRNA. This design preserves endogenous gene expression while enabling doxycycline-inducible activation of tetO-controlled transgenes. For Etv5-rtTA knock-in, P2A (derived from porcine teschovirus-1 2A) [18] driven the rtTA cassette was targeted into the junction region of last coding exon and 3′UTR of mouse Etv5 via sgRNA, preserving endogenous gene expression while enabling doxycycline-inducible activation of tetO-controlled transgenes. These mouse lines were generated with C57BL/6J mice. To generate inducible reporter mice, Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA lines were crossed with pTRE-H2BGFP transgenic mice purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Strain #:0 05104, RRID: IMSR_JAX: 005104), enabling doxycycline-inducible expression of nuclear GFP specifically in AT2 cells. Mice will be placed on a doxycycline diet and water two weeks prior to tissue collection. All animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, IACUC008529) at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

2.2. Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from tail biopsies using a standard proteinase K digestion method followed by ethanol precipitation or commercially available DNA extraction kits. PCR-based genotyping was performed using primers specific for the targeted Abca3-rtTA or Etv5-rtTA alleles as well as the pTRE-H2BGFP transgene, as listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer sequences and predicted product sizes.

Transgene

Primer Sequences (5′-3′)

Product Size (bp)

Abca3-rtTA

Forward: GGATGATTACTCTGTGAGCCAGATC

Reverse (WT): CTGGGGTCTCTCTGGATAAGCACTG

Reverse (Mut): AGACCTTGCATTCCTTTGGCGAGAG

WT: 434

Mut: 296

Etv5-rtTA

Forward: GTGTGATCTGTCTTCTCACGCAGGT

Reverse (WT): ACCACTGCCCTCGGTTGCCTGGATG

Reverse (Mut): CAGGAGTGGGTATGATGCCTGTCCA

WT: 314

Mut: 511

pTRE-H2BGFP [19]

Forward (WT): AGTGGCCTCTTCCAGAAATG

Reverse (WT): TGCGACTGTGTCTGATTTCC

Forward (Mut): GCTCGTTTAGTGAACCGTCAG

Reverse (Mut): TCTTCTGCGCCTTAGTCACC

WT: 521

Mut: 250

2.3. Flow Cytometry

Single-cell suspensions from embryonic, postnatal, or adult lungs were prepared as previously described [20]. Lungs were dissected, minced, and digested in a mixture of collagenase type I (2 mg/mL), Dispase (2 mg/mL), and DNase I (100 U/mL) at 37 °C for 30 min with gentle agitation. Digested tissue was filtered through a 70 µm cell strainer, centrifuged at 300× g for 5 min, lysed with red blood cell lysis buffer, and resuspended in HBSS containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were incubated with biotin conjugated primary antibodies (anti-CD31/34/45, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA, Cat # 13-0311-85, 13-0341-85, and 13-0451-85, RRIDs: AB_466421, AB_466426, and AB_466447) for 45 min at 4 °C. Fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibody (APC/Cyanine7 Streptavidin, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA, Cat # 405208) staining was performed together with surface staining using antibodies against Epcam (PerCP/Cy5.5 anti-CD326, BioLegend, Cat # 118220, RRID: AB_2246499), Sca1 (PE/Cyanine7 anti-Sca1, BioLegend, Cat # 108114, RRID: AB_493596), and CD24 (PE anti-CD24, BioLegend, Cat # 101808, RRID: AB_312841) to identify AT2 cells (Epcam+Sca1CD24). Dead cells were excluded using Fixable Viability Dye (eFluor™ 780, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat # 65-0865-18). Flow cytometry was performed on a BD LSRFortessa (San Jose, CA, USA). Data were acquired for at least 50,000 live events per sample and analyzed using FlowJo software (v10.8, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). GFP+ cells were quantified within the defined AT2 population, and gating strategies were consistently applied across all samples, including littermate controls lacking the rtTA transgenes.

2.4. Immunostaining

For immunofluorescence, lungs were inflated with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 28 cm H2O pressure and fixed for 4–24 h at 4 °C. Tissue was then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose overnight, a mixture of 30% sucrose and OCT at 1:1 for 4 h at 4 °C, embedded in OCT, and sectioned at 10 µm thickness. Sections were rinsed in PBS twice in PBS for 29 min, blocked in 5% normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies: anti-Sftpc (Cat # 10774-1-AP, proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, RRID: AB_2185497, 1:100) and anti-Pdpn (Cat # 8.1.1, DSHB, Iowa City, IA, USA, RRID: AB_531893, 1:50). After washing, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cy3 anti-Rabbit antibody, Cat# 111-165-003, Jackson ImmnoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA, USA, RRID: AB_2338000, 1:500 and AF647 anti-Syrian Hamster antibody, Cat # A-21451, AB_2535868, 1:500) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, and slides were mounted with antifade medium. Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) or a similar instrument, with identical acquisition settings across experimental and control samples.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted with a minimum of three biological replicates unless otherwise indicated. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo, and statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism (v9.0). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For multiple comparisons, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was applied as appropriate. Significance levels are indicated in figure legends (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

3. Results

3.1. Generation of Abca3- and Etv5-Driven Inducible Reporter Mouse Models

Abca3 and Etv5 are commonly used alongside surfactant genes, such as Sftpc, as markers of AT2 cells. Reanalysis of published scRNA-seq data [21] indicates that these genes are highly and specifically expressed in alveolar progenitors during early lung development and in fully differentiated AT2 cells at later stages (Figure S1). To establish precise and inducible tools for in vivo labeling of AT2 cells, we generated Abca3-rtTA (C57BL/6J-Abca3tm1(IRES-rtTA)Jid/) and Etv5-rtTA (C57BL/6J-Etv5tm1(P2A-rtTA)Jid/) knock-in mouse lines using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing (Figure 1A,B). In each targeting construct, an IRES-rtTA or P2A-rtTA cassette was integrated into the endogenous locus downstream of the coding sequence and flanked by 5′ and 3′ homology arms to ensure accurate recombination. This bicistronic expression strategy enables doxycycline-inducible transactivation while preserving physiological expression of the native Abca3 and Etv5 genes. Both Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA mice are viable and exhibit normal lung development without obvious pulmonary abnormalities, indicating that endogenous gene function is largely preserved. Founder animals were bred to pTRE-H2BGFP reporter mice [19] to generate the Abca3-H2BGFP (Abca3-rtTA; pTRE-H2BGFP) and Etv5-H2BGFP (Etv5-rtTA; pTRE-H2BGFP) dual transgenic lines. PCR genotyping using allele-specific primers confirmed successful rtTA and TRE-H2BGFP integration in multiple independent founders, with the absence of the WT band in targeted animals (Figure 1C,D). These data validate the establishment of two inducible, AT2-lineage reporter strains suitable for temporal control of gene expression and fluorescent lineage labeling.

3.2. Robust Alveolar Progenitor Cell Labeling in E15.5 Embryonic Lungs

To assess inducible labeling during early alveolar morphogenesis, doxycycline administration was initiated immediately upon vaginal plug detection and maintained continuously via doxycycline-supplemented chow and drinking water throughout gestation until embryo collection. Embryonic lungs were harvested at E15.5 and analyzed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Within the Epcam+ epithelial compartment, GFP expression was observed in over 80% of cells in both Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP lungs, reflecting highly efficient reporter activation, whereas pTRE-H2BGFP control littermates exhibited only baseline signal (Figure 2A,B). At this developmental stage, nearly all epithelial cells were CD24+, with no detectable Sca1+ cells, suggesting that alveolar and airway epithelial populations cannot be reliably distinguished using these markers. The Epcam+GFP fraction likely corresponds to airway epithelial cells. Examination of non-epithelial compartments confirmed the absence of GFP+ cells in immune, endothelial, and stromal populations (Figure S2A). A previous study suggested that distal tip progenitor cells persist through ~E17.5 and progressively acquire alveolar (AT1/AT2) markers [22], indicating that Abca3/Etv5-driven labeling at E15.5–E17.5 likely captures a mixed population of tip progenitors and differentiating alveolar cells. Immunostaining of lung sections demonstrated strong co-localization of GFP with the AT2 marker Sftpc, with GFP signal closely adjacent to but largely non-overlapping with the AT1 marker Pdpn, indicating that reporter activation is specifically restricted to tip progenitors and differentiating alveolar cells (Figure 2C). Together, these results demonstrate that both promoter systems are already transcriptionally active in a substantial fraction of developing distal lung epithelium and are capable of selectively marking alveolar progenitor cells (differentiating AT2 cells) at this stage.

Figure_1_1

Figure 1. Generation of Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP mouse models. (A,B) The design strategies of Abca3-rtTA (A) and Etv5-rtTA (B) mouse lines. (C,D) Representative genotyping results of Abca3-H2BGFP ((C), Abca3-rtTA; pTRE-H2BGFP) and Etv5-H2BGFP ((D), Etv5-rtTA; pTRE-H2BGFP) mouse.

3.3. Sustained and Lineage-Restricted Labeling at Late Embryonic Stage (E17.5)

To determine whether reporter activity is maintained during late gestation, we analyzed E17.5 lungs, a stage characterized by active surfactant production and ongoing AT2 lineage specification. Flow cytometry revealed GFP expression in over 80% of Epcam+ cells in Abca3-H2BGFP lungs and approximately 70% in Etv5-H2BGFP lungs, both markedly higher than the background signal in control mice (Figure 3A,B). As observed at E15.5, all Epcam+ epithelial cells were CD24+, with no detectable Sca1+ populations, indicating that alveolar and airway epithelial cells remain indistinguishable by these markers at this stage. Immunostaining confirmed strong co-localization of GFP with Sftpc+ alveolar progenitor epithelial cells, with minimal overlap with the AT1 marker Pdpn, demonstrating that reporter induction remains highly selective for the differentiating AT2 cells (Figure 3C). The slightly lower labeling efficiency in Etv5-H2BGFP lungs likely reflects developmental stage–dependent differences in promoter activity, potentially corresponding to temporal fluctuations in endogenous Etv5 expression during late alveologenesis.

Figure_2_1

Figure 2. Labeling of alveolar progenitors by the expression of Abca3 and Etv5 in embryonic day E15.5 (E15.5) mouse lungs. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for GFP+ cells in E15.5 Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP lungs, and littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP). (B) Quantification of the GFP+ cells in total Epcam+ cells by flow cytometry analysis. pTRE-H2BGFP, n = 5; Abca3-H2BGFP, n = 3; Etv5-H2BGFP, n = 3. **** p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. (C) Representative co-immunostaining of GFP with AT2 (Sftpc) and AT1 (pdpn) markers in lung sections from E15.5 Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP mice, compared with littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP). Scale bar: 50 μm.

Figure_3_1

Figure 3. Labeling of alveolar progenitors by the expression of Abca3 and Etv5 in embryonic day E17.5 (E17.5) mouse lungs. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for GFP+ cells in E17.5 Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP lungs, and littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP). (B) Quantification of the GFP+ cells in total Epcam+ cells by flow cytometry analysis. pTRE-H2BGFP, n = 8; Abca3-H2BGFP, n = 4; Etv5-H2BGFP, n = 3. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA. (C) Representative co-immunostaining of GFP with AT2 (Sftpc) and AT1 (pdpn) markers in lung sections from E17.5 Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP mice, compared with littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP). Scale bar: 50 μm.

3.4. High-Efficiency AT2 Labeling in Early Postnatal Lungs (P7)

To evaluate reporter performance during early postnatal alveolar expansion, we analyzed lungs at postnatal day 7 (P7). AT2 cells were identified using a refined flow cytometry gating strategy (Epcam+Sca1CD24), which reliably isolates the alveolar epithelial population at this developmental stage. GFP expression was observed in 98.6% of AT2 cells in Abca3-H2BGFP mice and 89.2% in Etv5-H2BGFP mice, reflecting near-complete labeling of the AT2 niche and demonstrating the high efficiency of both inducible reporter systems (Figure 4A,B). Analysis of non-epithelial fractions showed an absence of GFP+ cells in immune, endothelial, and stromal compartments, with only rare GFP+ events (Figure S2B)–likely attributable to incomplete Epcam staining or cell contaminants/doublets during flow cytometry recording. Histological analyses further validated these findings, showing robust nuclear GFP signal localized specifically to Sftpc+ AT2 cells, with minimal to no expression in neighboring Pdpn+ AT1 cells or other epithelial subsets (Figure 4C). These results indicate that both Abca3- and Etv5-driven reporters achieve highly penetrant, lineage-restricted labeling, capturing the vast majority of the AT2 compartment. Collectively, this highlights their utility for fate-mapping and functional studies during a critical window of postnatal alveolar development, when AT2 cells are actively expanding and maturing.

3.5. Efficient AT2 Targeting in Adult Lungs under Homeostasis and Early after Injury

To evaluate reporter stability in adult lungs and during acute epithelial injury, we profiled mice at baseline (D0) and day 4 following intratracheal bleomycin administration (D4), a time point representing peak inflammatory signaling and early epithelial damage. Under homeostatic conditions, GFP was detected in 99.5% of AT2 cells in Abca3-H2BGFP mice and 94.5% in Etv5-H2BGFP mice, confirming sustained, near-saturating labeling efficiency in the mature AT2 compartment (Figure 5A,B). Notably, these labeling efficiencies closely mirror those obtained using the tamoxifen-inducible Sftpc-CreER; Rosa26-tdTomato system [3] (Figure S3), highlighting the comparability of these doxycycline-responsive models and supporting their utility as fully accessible alternatives for adult AT2 cell tracking and lineage analysis. Direct comparison with the Sftpc-rtTA transgenic line [6] was not pursued, as human SFTPC promoter–driven reporters have been reported to exhibit off-target expression in airway epithelial cells [23], limiting their specificity for AT2-restricted labeling. Following bleomycin injury, GFP labeling remained highly preserved, marking 82.0% (Abca3) and 81.1% (Etv5) of AT2 cells despite early injury-induced cellular stress and partial epithelial attrition (Figure 5A,B). Again, examination of non-epithelial compartments showed no substantive GFP signal in immune, endothelial, or stromal cells, with only rare GFP+ events detected (Figure S4), most likely reflecting technical artifacts such as incomplete Epcam staining or cell contaminants/doublets during flow cytometric processing. Immunostaining confirmed that GFP remained tightly co-localized with Sftpc+ cells both at baseline and post-injury (Figure 5C,D), demonstrating that promoter specificity is maintained even during acute epithelial remodeling. The observed reduction in GFP+ frequency after injury likely reflects known early responses, including AT2 apoptosis, transient dedifferentiation, and plasticity of the epithelial cell state, rather than a loss of promoter fidelity.

Figure_4_1

Figure 4. Labeling of AT2 cells by the expression of Abca3 and Etv5 on Postnatal day 7 (P7) mouse lungs. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for GFP+ cells in P7 Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP lungs, and littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP). (B) Quantification of the GFP+ cells in total Epcam+Sca-1CD24 AT2 cells by flow cytometry analysis. pTRE-H2BGFP, n = 9; Abca3-H2BGFP, n = 6; Etv5-H2BGFP, n = 5. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. (C) Representative co-immunostaining of GFP with AT2 (Sftpc) and AT1 (pdpn) markers in lung sections from P7 Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP mice, compared with littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP). Scale bar: 50 μm.

Figure_5_1

Figure 5. Labeling of AT2 cells by the expression of Abca3 and Etv5 in adult mouse lungs before and after bleomycin injury. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for GFP+ cells in lungs from adult Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP, and littermate control (pTRE-H2BGFP) mice before (D0) and 4 days after bleomycin injury (D4). (B) Quantification of the GFP+ cells in total Epcam+ Sca-1CD24 AT2 cells by flow cytometry analysis. pTRE-H2BGFP (D0), n = 8; Abca3-H2BGFP (D0), n = 4; Abca3-H2BGFP (D4), n = 7, Etv5-H2BGFP (D0), n = 5; Etv5-H2BGFP (D4), n = 4. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. (C) Representative co-immunostaining of GFP with AT2 (Sftpc) and AT1 (pdpn) markers in lung sections from adult Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP, and littermate control (pTRE-H2BGFP) mice before (D0) and 4 days after bleomycin injury (D4). Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Quantification of the ratios of Sftpc+GFP+ and Sftpc+GFP cells in lung sections from adult Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP, and littermate control (pTRE-H2BGFP) mice before (D0) and 4 days after bleomycin injury (D4).

3.6. Advantages and Limitations

Together, these findings demonstrate that Abca3- and Etv5-driven H2BGFP reporters efficiently and specifically label AT2 cells in adult lungs, maintaining high labeling efficiency and specificity under both homeostatic and early post-injury conditions. These models thus provide versatile and reliable tools for studying AT2 cell biology in vivo, offering potential applications for investigating gene function, cellular dynamics, and regenerative mechanisms in the context of adult lung injury and disease. A major strength of these systems is their robust, doxycycline-inducible labeling across developmental stages, from embryonic lung morphogenesis through postnatal alveolar expansion and adult homeostasis. The high penetrance and lineage restriction of GFP expression enable precise tracking and isolation of AT2 cells with minimal off-target labeling in non-epithelial compartments. Moreover, the preservation of endogenous Abca3 and Etv5 function in the knock-in designs supports physiological relevance without overt developmental defects.

However, several limitations should be considered. During early embryogenesis, Abca3- and Etv5-driven labeling captures a mixed population of distal tip progenitors and differentiating alveolar cells, limiting precise discrimination of early lineage states. Labeling efficiency is also modestly reduced following acute lung injury, likely reflecting AT2 cell loss or transient phenotypic changes. In addition, doxycycline-dependent systems require sustained exposure, which may introduce variability in induction timing and levels. In addition, although both Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA mice were viable and exhibited normal lung development without obvious pulmonary abnormalities under our experimental conditions, prior studies have reported potential rtTA-associated toxicity in certain transgenic contexts [24], which should be considered when interpreting results from Tet-On–based systems. Despite these considerations, the overall specificity, efficiency, and temporal control of these reporters make them powerful tools for AT2-focused studies across lung development, homeostasis, and injury.

4. Discussion

AT2 cells are central to maintaining alveolar homeostasis, mediating repair after injury, and serving as progenitors for AT1 cells [2]. Precise genetic labeling of AT2 cells has been critical for dissecting their lineage dynamics during lung development, postnatal maturation, and in response to injury or disease [3]. Traditional labeling approaches, such as Sftpc-Cre or Sftpc-rtTA lines, have enabled lineage tracing and conditional gene manipulation but are limited by developmental-stage-specific expression and occasional off-target activity in distal airway progenitors. Our study introduces Abca3-rtTA and Etv5-rtTA knock-in mouse lines as complementary tools for AT2 cell labeling. Both genes are highly enriched in AT2 cells throughout development and adulthood, and the inducible nature of the rtTA system allows temporal control over reporter expression. Using these models, we demonstrated robust and specific labeling of AT2 cells during embryonic stages (E15.5, E17.5), early postnatal development (P7), and in adult lungs, including under injury conditions induced by bleomycin. The high labeling efficiency and specificity of these systems make them valuable tools for studying AT2 biology in both homeostatic and pathological contexts, enabling more refined lineage-tracing studies and mechanistic investigations into alveolar epithelial dynamics.

Beyond lineage tracing, the Abca3- and Etv5-driven rtTA systems provide versatile platforms for conditional gain or loss-of-function studies in AT2 cells through tetO-mediated transgene regulation. By crossing these rtTA lines with tetO-driven constructs, researchers can selectively manipulate gene expression in AT2 cells with temporal control using doxycycline administration. For example, in our recent work [25], we found that ZIP8 is critical for AT2 progenitor function, regulating self-renewal and differentiation, and that its deficiency impairs lung epithelial regeneration, promoting fibrosis [26]. To confirm this finding, we may consider generating a tetO-Zip8 system crossed with an Abca3-rtTA or Etv5-rtTA line to investigate the role of Zip8 in AT2 cell function during lung injury. Conditional overexpression of Zip8 in AT2 cells allowed us to dissect its impact on epithelial repair, inflammation, and fibrosis in a controlled temporal window.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling plays a central role in lung morphogenesis, epithelial cell maintenance, and injury-induced repair, with FGFR2 representing a key receptor mediating AT2 cell proliferation, survival, and regenerative competence [27,28]. Leveraging the inducible and AT2-restricted expression of Abca3-rtTA or Etv5-rtTA, these lines can be crossed with a tetO-FGFR2-HFc dominant-negative mouse strain [29] (JAX #025672) to achieve temporally controlled inhibition of FGF signaling specifically in AT2 cells in vivo. This approach enables functional dissection of FGF-dependent processes in discrete biological contexts, including postnatal alveolar maturation, adult tissue homeostasis, and epithelial repair following lung injury. Inducible FGFR blockade in AT2 cells would allow investigators to determine how FGF signaling influences progenitor self-renewal, lineage plasticity, and crosstalk with niche populations such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune effectors.

Another potential application of these lines is in lung cancer research. For example, the Abca3- or Etv5-rtTA mice could be crossed with a tetO-KrasG12D responder mouse line [30] (JAX #004375) to generate a model of lung adenocarcinoma in which Kras is selectively and continuously activated in AT2 cells under doxycycline control. This approach allows researchers to precisely regulate oncogene expression temporally and spatially, providing a controlled system to study the initiation, progression, and cellular dynamics of lung tumors. By enabling AT2-specific oncogene activation, these models can also be used to investigate interactions between transformed epithelial cells and the lung microenvironment, test targeted therapies, and dissect mechanisms of tumorigenesis at specific developmental or adult stages. This demonstrates the broad utility of Abca3- and Etv5-rtTA lines beyond homeostasis and injury models, extending their relevance to lung cancer modeling and translational studies.

Despite the robust labeling observed, these models have inherent limitations. Notably, labeling efficiency is not 100%, as a small fraction of AT2 cells do not express Abca3 or Etv5 at detectable levels. This heterogeneity may reflect developmental-stage-specific expression, regional differences within the alveolar epithelium, or transient transcriptional states of AT2 cells. Consequently, a subset of AT2 cells may escape labeling, potentially limiting the interpretation of lineage-tracing experiments or conditional gene manipulation in studies requiring complete targeting of the AT2 population. Additionally, while doxycycline-inducible systems allow temporal control, incomplete induction or variability in doxycycline delivery could further contribute to heterogeneity in reporter expression. Researchers should consider these factors when designing experiments, particularly in studies where precise quantification of the entire AT2 population is critical. Future refinements, such as combining multiple AT2-specific promoters or optimizing induction protocols, may help mitigate these limitations and further enhance the utility of these models.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the Abca3- and Etv5-rtTA knock-in mouse lines provide highly specific, inducible, and versatile tools for labeling and manipulating AT2 cells across development, postnatal maturation, and adult lung injury. When combined with tetO-mediated transgene systems, these lines enable targeted gain or loss-of-function studies in AT2 cells, facilitating mechanistic investigations into lung repair and disease. While not every AT2 cell is labeled, the high efficiency and fidelity of these models make them powerful platforms for advancing our understanding of alveolar epithelial dynamics and for informing therapeutic strategies targeting AT2-mediated repair.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be found at: https://www.sciepublish.com/article/pii/870, Figure S1: Transcriptional of Sftpc, Abca3, and Etv5 in embryonic and postnatal mouse lungs by published single cell RNA-seq dataset GSE149563; Figure S2: Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for GFP+ cells in CD31/34/45+ mixed immune/endothelial cells and in double negative stromal cells in embryonic (A, E15.5) and postnatal (B, P7) Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP lungs, and littermate controls (pTRE-H2BGFP); Figure S3: Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for tdTomato+ cells in lungs from uninjured adult Sftpc-CreER; Rosa26-tdTomato and littermate control (Rosa26-tdTomato) mice after Tamoxifen induction; Figure S4: Representative flow cytometry plots showing the gating strategy for GFP+ cells in CD31/34/45+ mixed immune/endothelial cells and in double negative stromal cells in lungs from adult Abca3-H2BGFP and Etv5-H2BGFP, and littermate control (pTRE-H2BGFP) mice before (D0) and 4 days after bleomycin injury (D4).

Statement of the Use of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGTP for language proofreading. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the lab members for their support and discussion during the study.

Author Contributions

X.L. and D.J. conceived the study. X.L., X.Z. and J.L. designed and analyzed the data. X.L., Z.L., V.K. and N.L. performed data analysis and interpretation. X.L. and D.J. wrote the paper.

Ethics Statement

All animal experiments in this study were conducted with the approval of the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #008529, approveal date: 26 February 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Mouse lines generated in this study will be deposited to the Mutant Mouse Resource & Research Centers (MMRRC) and will be made available on request by contacting the corresponding author (dianhua.jiang@cshs.org).

Funding

This work was funded by National Institutes of Health grants R01-HL172990 (D.J.), R01-AG078655 (J.L.), American Heart Association Career Development Award 24CDA1268568 (X.L.) and Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation PFF Scholars Program 1272558 (X.L.).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Morrisey EE, Hogan BL. Preparing for the first breath: Genetic and cellular mechanisms in lung development. Dev. Cell 2010, 18, 8–23. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.12.010 [Google Scholar]

  2. Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Rackley CR, Bowie EJ, Keene DR, Stripp BR, et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 3025–3036. DOI:10.1172/JCI68782 [Google Scholar]

  3. Liang J, Zhang Y, Xie T, Liu N, Chen H, Geng Y, et al. Hyaluronan and TLR4 promote surfactant-protein-C-positive alveolar progenitor cell renewal and prevent severe pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1285–1293. DOI:10.1038/nm.4192 [Google Scholar]

  4. Zuttion MSSR, Moore SKL, Chen P, Beppu AK, Hook JL. New Insights into the Alveolar Epithelium as a Driver of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1273. DOI:10.3390/biom12091273 [Google Scholar]

  5. Han GC, Sinjab A, Rahal Z, Lynch AM, Treekitkarnmongkol W, Liu YJ, et al. An atlas of epithelial cell states and plasticity in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2024, 628, E1. DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-07277-4 [Google Scholar]

  6. Tichelaar JW, Lu W, Whitsett JK. Conditional expression of fibroblast growth factor-7 in the developing and mature lung. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 11858–11864. DOI:10.1074/jbc.275.16.11858 [Google Scholar]

  7. Liu QZ, Liu K, Cui GZ, Huang XZ, Yao S, Guo WK, et al. Lung regeneration by multipotent stem cells residing at the bronchioalveolar-duct junction. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 728–738. DOI:10.1038/s41588-019-0346-6 [Google Scholar]

  8. Rock JR, Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Xue Y, Harris JR, Liang JR, et al. Multiple stromal populations contribute to pulmonary fibrosis without evidence for epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, E1475–E1483. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1117988108 [Google Scholar]

  9. Liu K, Meng XF, Liu ZX, Tang MX, Lv Z, Huang XZ, et al. Tracing the origin of alveolar stem cells in lung repair and regeneration. Cell 2024, 187, 2428–2445. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.010 [Google Scholar]

  10. Guo MZ, Du YN, Gokey JJ, Ray S, Bell SM, Adam M, et al. Single cell RNA analysis identifies cellular heterogeneity and adaptive responses of the lung at birth. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 37. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-07770-1 [Google Scholar]

  11. Habermann AC, Gutierrez AJ, Bui LT, Yahn SL, Winters N, Calvi CL, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals profibrotic roles of distinct epithelial and mesenchymal lineages in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba1972. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aba1972 [Google Scholar]

  12. McCauley KB, Alysandratos KD, Jacob A, Hawkins F, Caballero IS, Vedaie M, et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived SCGB3A2+Airway Epithelium. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 10, 1579–1595. DOI:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.013 [Google Scholar]

  13. Ban N, Matsumura Y, Sakai H, Takanezawa Y, Sasaki M, Arai H, et al. ABCA3 as a lipid transporter in pulmonary surfactant biogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 9628–9634. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M611767200 [Google Scholar]

  14. Fitzgerald ML, Xavier R, Haley KJ, Welti R, Goss JL, Brown CE, et al. ABCA3 inactivation in mice causes respiratory failure, loss of pulmonary surfactant, and depletion of lung phosphatidylglycerol. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 621–632. DOI:10.1194/jlr.M600449-JLR200 [Google Scholar]

  15. Shulenin S, Nogee LM, Annilo T, Wert SE, Whitsett JA, Dean M. Gene mutations in newborns with fatal surfactant deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1296–1303. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa032178 [Google Scholar]

  16. Wittmann T, Frixel S, Höppner S, Schindlbeck U, Schams A, Kappler M, et al. Increased Risk of Interstitial Lung Disease in Children with a Single R288K Variant of ABCA3. Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 183–191. DOI:10.2119/molmed.2015.00244 [Google Scholar]

  17. Zhang Z, Newton K, Kummerfeld SK, Webster J, Kirkpatrick DS, Phu L, et al. Transcription factor Etv5 is essential for the maintenance of alveolar type II cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3903–3908. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1621177114 [Google Scholar]

  18. Ahier A, Jarriault S. Simultaneous Expression of Multiple Proteins Under a Single Promoter in Caenorhabditis elegans via a Versatile 2A-Based Toolkit. Genetics 2014, 196, 605–613. DOI:10.1534/genetics.113.160846 [Google Scholar]

  19. Tumbar T, Guasch G, Greco V, Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Rendl M, et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 2004, 303, 359–363. DOI:10.1126/science.1092436 [Google Scholar]

  20. Liu X, Rowan SC, Liang JR, Yao CF, Huang GL, Deng N, et al. Categorization of lung mesenchymal cells in development and fibrosis. Iscience 2021, 24, 102551. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102551 [Google Scholar]

  21. Zepp JA, Morley MP, Loebel C, Kremp MM, Chaudhry FN, Basil MC, et al. Genomic, epigenomic, and biophysical cues controlling the emergence of the lung alveolus. Science 2021, 371, eabc3172. DOI:10.1126/science.abc3172 [Google Scholar]

  22. Laresgoiti U, Nikolic MZ, Rao C, Brady JL, Richardson RV, Batchen EJ, et al. Lung epithelial tip progenitors integrate glucocorticoid- and STAT3-mediated signals to control progeny fate. Development 2016, 143, 3686–3699. DOI:10.1242/dev.134023 [Google Scholar]

  23. Chen HY, Matsumoto K, Brockway BL, Rackley CR, Liang JR, Lee JH, et al. Airway Epithelial Progenitors Are Region Specific and Show Differential Responses to Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 1948–1960. DOI:10.1002/stem.1150 [Google Scholar]

  24. Markusic D, Oude-Elferink R, Das AT, Berkhout B, Seppen J. Comparison of single regulated lentiviral vectors with rtTA expression driven by an autoregulatory loop or a constitutive promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, e63. DOI:10.1093/nar/gni062 [Google Scholar]

  25. Liang JR, Huang GL, Liu X, Taghavifar F, Liu NS, Wang YZ, et al. The ZIP8/SIRT1 axis regulates alveolar progenitor cell renewal in aging and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e157338. DOI:10.1172/JCI157338 [Google Scholar]

  26. Foster PS, Tay HL, Oliver BG. Deficiency in the zinc transporter ZIP8 impairs epithelia renewal and enhances lung fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e160595. DOI:10.1172/JCI160595 [Google Scholar]

  27. Liberti DC, Kremp MM, Liberti WA, Penkala IJ, Li SR, Zhou S, et al. Alveolar epithelial cell fate is maintained in a spatially restricted manner to promote lung regeneration after acute injury. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 109092. DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109092 [Google Scholar]

  28. Dorry SJ, Ansbro BO, Ornitz DM, Mutlu GM, Guzy RD. FGFR2 Is Required for AEC2 Homeostasis and Survival after Bleomycin-induced Lung Injury. Am. J. Resp. Cell Mol. 2020, 62, 608–621. DOI:10.1165/rcmb.2019-0079OC [Google Scholar]

  29. Hokuto I, Perl AK, Whitsett JA. Prenatal, but not postnatal, inhibition of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling causes emphysema. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 415–421. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M208328200 [Google Scholar]

  30. Fisher GH, Wellen SL, Klimstra D, Lenczowski JM, Tichelaar JW, Lizak MJ, et al. Induction and apoptotic regression of lung adenocarcinomas by regulation of a transgene in the presence and absence of tumor suppressor genes. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 3249–3262. DOI:10.1101/gad.947701 [Google Scholar]

TOP