SCIEPublish

Post-COVID SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Persistence: A Critical Review of Mass Spectrometry Methodology and the Confound of Vaccine-Derived Antigens

Communication Open Access

Post-COVID SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Persistence: A Critical Review of Mass Spectrometry Methodology and the Confound of Vaccine-Derived Antigens

Author Information
1
Institute for Biochemical Pharmacology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
ADSI—Austrian Drug Screening Institute GmbH, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 06 May 2026 Revised: 26 May 2026 Accepted: 15 June 2026 Published: 29 June 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:20
Downloads:5
Immune Discov. 2026, 2(2), 10005; DOI: 10.70322/immune.2026.10005
ABSTRACT: Persistent SARS-CoV-2 antigen has been proposed as a driver of post-COVID condition (PCC), with targeted mass spectrometry multiple reaction monitorin/selected reaction monitoring (MRM/SRM) increasingly invoked as quantitative evidence. We appraise the targeted-MS literature on SARS-CoV-2 antigen in genuine human clinical specimens and re-analyse a focal study, which reported spike and nucleocapsid “protein” concentrations in ng/µL from two proteotypic peptides per target with 13C/15N internal standards. These values are either physically impossible as intact protein or, more likely, raw peptide concentrations reported without the required ≈122-fold molecular-weight correction. Only 15 of 65 patients (26%) had cellular pellet spike above the authors’ own limit of quantification; nucleocapsid was essentially undetectable; and in those 15, the nucleocapsid: spike molar ratio was strongly inverted relative to intact virions, incompatible with a viral source. Critically, no targeted-MS method has ever quantified spike in human blood—the prior literature is nucleocapsid detection in respiratory specimens and spike quantification in vaccine or recombinant material—so the reported blood-spike values lack any validated precedent and exceed the most sensitive validated platform (single-molecule arrays) by several orders of magnitude, with no enrichment step. Finally, 77% of the cohort was vaccinated, and a measurable spike was concentrated among vaccinated individuals. The source’s own supplement inconsistently reports vaccination status. Their 2024 predecessor publication withheld it entirely. The MRM/SRM data, therefore, do not support persistent viral antigen as a general driver of PCC. Minimum standards are proposed: molar reporting, strict limit-of-quantification (LOQ) compliance, qualifier-ion confirmation, vaccine-discrimination peptides, stoichiometric cross-validation, and vaccination-status disclosure. We suggest that the cellular blood component, routinely discarded, warrants direct investigation in the context of spike persistence and PCC symptoms.
Keywords: Post-COVID condition; SARS-CoV-2 antigen persistence; Long COVID biomarkers; Targeted mass spectrometry; MRM/SRM; Spike protein quantification; Nucleocapsid protein detection; Quantitative proteomics

Graphical Abstract

TOP