For several important organs, fibrosis-related diseases are classical disorders. Examples include lung fibrosis, liver fibrosis, and kidney fibrosis. Lung fibrosis is observed in restrictive lung insufficiency, in which the membrane between the alveoli and lung capillaries becomes thickened [
1]. As a result, the diffusion of oxygen from air to blood, and of CO
2 in the opposite direction, is restricted, leading to dyspnea. This disease is severe, with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis of only 3–5 years after diagnosis [
1]. Lung transplantation may be urgently required, but it is, of course, out of practice for many patients.
Hepatic fibrosis is often seen in the early development of cirrhosis. It may be caused by high alcohol intake [
2] or by obesity due to dysregulation of glucagon, glycogen, and gluconeogenesis [
3]. Although relatively common and initially without dramatic symptoms, its progression is serious and potentially fatal. Fibrosis consists of connective tissue infiltrating the liver cell architecture, which disrupts normal liver function. This can cause portal hypertension, ascites, and esophageal bleeding [
4]. Furthermore, metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH), with additional hepatic fibrosis, is today the primary reason for liver transplantation [
5].
Kidney fibrosis is frequently observed following diseases that alter renal structure and function, such as diabetes, hypertension, and nephritis [
6]. The accumulation of connective tissue in the kidneys impairs urine concentration capacity, which may ultimately cause uremia.
There are no effective causal treatments for all three conditions, and in advanced stages, the prognosis is poor. We recently published that sphingolipid sulfatide, especially its isoform C16 sulfatide, can inhibit fibroblasts and thereby prevent connective tissue formation [
7]. The idea for this study arose from the observation that insulin injections often induce local fibrosis in subcutaneous tissue, requiring daily changes of injection sites in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Interestingly, such fibrosis is not seen in the pancreas, where sulfatide is present together with insulin. In our study, sulfatide and C16 sulfatide were shown to inhibit fibroblast growth at concentrations of 30 μM [
7].
The first step of sphingolipid biosynthesis, and thus of sulfatide, is the condensation of serine and palmitoyl-CoA, catalyzed by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT). Several molecules inhibit SPT, some isolated from fungi. For example, myriocin, derived from
Isaria sinclairii, and sphingofungin B, derived from
Aspergillus fumigatus [
8], both inhibit SPT and thereby sulfatide biosynthesis. After harvesting, wheat must be stored properly to prevent fungal growth under humid conditions.
Aspergillus fumigatus is often found in poorly stored wheat grain [
9]. Thus, the presence of
A. fumigatus and sphingofungin B in wheat could impair sulfatide biosynthesis in humans and should be avoided.
We hereby propose the use of sulfatide or C16 sulfatide for causal prevention or early treatment of fibrosis in the various organs. For lung fibrosis, inhalation delivery seems straightforward. For hepatic and kidney fibrosis, treatment is more challenging. Sulfatide is relatively expensive to produce or isolate, but the cholesterol-lowering drug fenofibrate may be used instead; this drug has been shown to increase sulfatide levels in mice, is nontoxic, and has been used safely for many years [
10]. However, it must be stressed that no clinical studies of sulfatide in fibrosis have yet been performed, and the treatment may not be effective in all types of fibrosis.
In conclusion, we propose the use of sulfatide against fibrosis. Administration in the lungs is relatively simple, whereas strategies that enhance endogenous sulfatide production, such as fenofibrate treatment, may be more feasible for the liver and kidneys.
Conceptualization, K.B.; Writing—Original Draft Preperation, R.T. and K.B.; Writing—Review & Editing, R.T. and K.B.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
No novel data was generated in this study.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.