ABSTRACT:
This commentary
introduces a conceptual framework that reinterprets biodiversity assessment as
a continuum, spanning from Dark diversity, representing the unobserved or
uncolonized potential of species ecologically suited to a system, to Bright
diversity, conceived as an aspirational, fully integrated upper bound of
biodiversity knowledge. Bright diversity encompasses not only observed
components and their intricate interactions, but also a profound understanding
of the reasons for species' presence or absence, including the inferred
insights from Dark diversity across taxonomic, functional, phylogenetic, and
genetic facets. Situated in between is Grey diversity, which characterizes the
predominant state of partial knowledge and inherent uncertainty in real-world
ecological assessments as an epistemic gradient. By delineating this
epistemological gradient, the framework offers a heuristic tool for ecologists
and conservationists to critically evaluate the clarity, completeness, and
uncertainty embedded in biodiversity data, and an operational basis for
“epistemic cartography”, i.e., the spatial mapping of knowledge
sufficiency and uncertainty. It facilitates the identification of knowledge
gaps, guides research priorities, and informs conservation actions, especially
under conditions of incomplete information, through a compact workflow and
transparent indicators. This conceptual spectrum serves as both an
epistemological reflection and a practical guide for advancing biodiversity
science, while outlining a forward-looking agenda that leverages multi-faceted
“bands of biodiversity knowledge” to support robust biodiversity planning.
Keywords:
Bands of biodiversity
knowledge; Biodiversity; Bright diversity; Dark diversity;
Ecological knowledge; Epistemological gradient; Grey diversity; Uncertainty mapping