SCIEPublish

Flood Vulnerability, Social Risk, and Economic Damage Assessment in the Lower Karnali River Basin, Nepal

Article Open Access

Flood Vulnerability, Social Risk, and Economic Damage Assessment in the Lower Karnali River Basin, Nepal

Author Information
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Nepal Engineering College, Pokhara University, Bhaktapur 44800, Nepal
2
School of Science, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal
3
Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal
4
Department of Civil Engineering, Himalaya College of Engineering, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal
5
Department of Meteorology, Trichandra Multiple Campus, Kathmandu 44605, Nepal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 07 May 2026 Revised: 15 June 2026 Accepted: 03 July 2026 Published: 20 July 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:12
Downloads:7
Hydroecol. Eng. 2026, 3(3), 10008; DOI: 10.70322/hee.2026.10008
ABSTRACT: The lower Karnali River basin is one of Nepal’s most flood-prone regions, yet it has lacked an integrated risk assessment. This study presents the first comprehensive analysis combining physical vulnerability, social vulnerability, and economic damage assessment for the corridor. Utilizing a validated 2D HEC-RAS model across eight return periods (2–500 years), we quantified impacts on 23,929 buildings, 477 km of roads, and 16,065 hectares of paddy cropland using locally calibrated depth-damage curves. Those calibrations were mainly focused on three building typologies, two road surface classes, and paddy crops at the maturity stage. A Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was developed for 27 wards, integrating demographics, healthcare access, and education. Findings indicate total economic damages range from NPR 395 million (2-year) to NPR 3538 million (500-year), with buildings consistently accounting for the largest share (41–42%). Madhuwan Ward 6, Geruwa Ward 1, and Rajapur Ward 7 emerged as the highest combined flood risk hotspots through the integration of social vulnerability and physical hazard. The results prove that social infrastructure investment, particularly in healthcare, serves as a direct flood risk reduction measure. This research provides a spatially explicit evidence base to guide targeted mitigation, land-use policy, and social protection in the basin.
Keywords: Flood risk; HEC-RAS; Inundation; Vulnerability; Depth-damage; Socio-economic; Lower Karnali; Infrastructure

Graphical Abstract

TOP