SCIEPublish

Case Studies of Acute Care of Ventilator Pump Failure: A Medicolegal Interpretation of When Conventional Care Is Negligent

Article Open Access

Case Studies of Acute Care of Ventilator Pump Failure: A Medicolegal Interpretation of When Conventional Care Is Negligent

Author Information
1
Department of Neurology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
2
Center for Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation, University Hospital, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
3
Court-Appointed Medical Expert, Judiciary of the State of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30130-911, Brazil
4
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, University Hospital, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 27 April 2026 Revised: 03 June 2026 Accepted: 01 July 2026 Published: 14 July 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:7
Downloads:4
Perspect. Legal Forensic Sci. 2026, 3(2), 10005; DOI: 10.70322/plfs.2026.10005
ABSTRACT: Ventilatory pump failure is respiratory insufficiency caused by weakness of the inspiratory and expiratory muscles, leading to hypoventilation, hypercapnia, and ineffective cough rather than primary lung disease. This article analyzes five medicolegal cases in which conventional acute-care management of ventilatory pump failure resulted in death, anoxic injury, prolonged tracheostomy mechanical ventilation, or avoidable institutionalization. The cases were reviewed to identify recurrent clinical and legal failures, including removal of continuous noninvasive ventilatory support, administration of supplemental oxygen without correction of hypoventilation, inadequate low-pressure noninvasive ventilation, failure to use mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for airway clearance, and refusal to consider extubation to continuous noninvasive ventilatory support despite available published protocols. Across the cases, tracheostomy or death was often framed as inevitable, although feasible noninvasive alternatives existed. From a medicolegal perspective, these omissions raise concerns about breach of duty, failure to obtain informed consent, and loss of chance. The analysis suggests that customary practice is not necessarily reasonable practice when evidence-based alternatives are available and clinically applicable. For cognitively intact patients with ventilatory pump failure, acute-care teams should consider and document noninvasive ventilatory support and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation before proceeding to invasive or palliative pathways.
Keywords: Ventilatory pump failure; Medical malpractice; Noninvasive ventilatory support; Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation; Tracheostomy; Informed consent; Loss of chance
TOP