Article Open Access

Plant Proteins Availability in Europe and Asia: A Causality Analysis of Climate, Demographics, and Economic Factors

Rural and Regional Development . 2024, 2(1), 10002; https://doi.org/10.35534/rrd.2024.10002
1
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 041006, Nigeria
2
Faculty of Forestry, Geography and Geomatics, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
3
Action-Research for Sustainable Development NGO, Department of Research Project, Cotonou 03296, Benin
4
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Çukurova University, Adana 01330, Turkey
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 28 Oct 2023    Accepted: 03 Jan 2024    Published: 11 Jan 2024   

Abstract

The article examines the availability of plant-based proteins in Europe and Asia, considering the challenges posed by climate, demographics, and economics. The availability of these proteins is crucial given the growing impact of climate, economic, and social variables. Indeed, these factors play a decisive role in the production and accessibility of plant-based proteins across countries. The study employed a causality analysis method using regression models to determine the relative impact of these factors on protein availability. Two indicators were prioritized: total national production and the daily accessible quantity per person. This approach made it possible to construct hypothetical trajectories, showcasing the interrelations between the different variables. The results show that the availability of plant-based proteins varies across regions. Factors such as rising temperatures, increasing pollutants, and rising prices of plant proteins are particularly concerning. In this context, legumes appear as a promising alternative. They offer resilience against climatic variations while being an excellent protein source. The findings also encourage rethinking our consumption. Meat, with its significant ecological footprint, should see its consumption decrease in favor of plant-based proteins, ensuring a more sustainable diet. To facilitate this transition, the importance of appropriate public policies and incentives for producing and consuming plant proteins is emphasized.

References

1.
Voisin N, Liu L, Hejazi M, Tesfa T, Li H, Huang M, et al. One-way coupling of an integrated assessment model and a water resources model: evaluation and implications of future changes over the US Midwest. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17, 4555–4575. [Google Scholar]
2.
Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti M. Environmental Impact of Different Agricultural Management Practices: Conventional vs. Organic Agriculture. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 95–124. [Google Scholar]
3.
FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture |Agrifood Economics|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2002. Available online: https://www.fao.org/agrifood-economics/publications/detail/en/c/122044/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
4.
Chardigny J-M. Les Protéines Végétales Pour l’alimentation Humaine. Rev. Assoc. Fran. Agron. 2017, 7, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
5.
Sijpestijn GF, Wezel A, Chriki S. L’agroécologie peut-elle contribuer à satisfaire nos besoins en protéines d’ici 2050 ? Viandes Prod. Carnés. 2023. Available online: https://isara.hal.science/hal-04000354/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
6.
Kakietek J, Mehta M, Shekar M. Mettre à l’échelle le traitement de l’émaciation sévère. Un cadre d’investissement pour la nutrition. 2017. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/dfa50f4d-c426-5eaf-9583 de9963d906c1/content (accessed on 7 January 2024).
7.
Wattiaux M. Dairy sector across the world: National trends and opportunities for sustainable growth. In Large Dairy Herd Management; ADSA: Champaign, IL, USA, 2017; pp. 3–18.
8.
Esnouf C, Russel M, Bricas N. Pour Une Alimentation Durable. Réflexion Stratégique duALIne; Éditions Quae: Versailles, France, 2011; p. 288.
9.
BIPE. Étude-socio-économique-chasse-bipe-juillet-2015. Available online: https://aducc.e-monsite.com/medias/files/etude-socio-economique-chasse-bipe-juillet-2015.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2024).
10.
TerresInovia. Enquête Terres Inovia sur les Dégâts d’oiseaux et Petits Gibiers. 2016. Available online: https://www.terresinovia.fr/documents/20126/454618/Synth_enqu_declaration_oiseaux_2016_CSE__1_1_def.pdf/0d454bf9-90dd-f3d5-1f7b-a8d49245f930?t=1554042597031 (accessed on 7 January 2024).
11.
Medek DE, Schwartz J, Myers SS. Estimated Effects of Future Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations on Protein Intake and the Risk of Protein Deficiency by Country and Region. Environ. Health Perspect. Publ. 2017, 125. doi:10.1289/EHP41.
12.
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar]
13.
Field RD, Kim D, LeGrande AN, Worden J, Kelley M, Schmidt GA. Evaluating climate model performance in the tropics with retrievals of water isotopic composition from Aura TES. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 6030–6036. [Google Scholar]
14.
Guéguen J, Walrand S, Bourgeois O. Les protéines végétales : contexte et potentiels en alimentation humaine. Cah. Nutr. Diét. 2016, 51, 177–185. [Google Scholar]
15.
Wezel A, Soboksa G, McClelland S, Delespesse F, Boissau A. The blurred boundaries of ecological, sustainable, and agroecological intensification: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar]
16.
Dorin B, Hourcade J-C, Cattin MB. A World without Farmers? The Lewis Path Revisited. 2011. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278619140_A_World_without_Farmers_The_Lewis_Path_Revisited (accessed on 7 January 2024).
17.
Mudasir A, Shahida Q, Mansoor-Hussain A, Shahida A, Adil G, Mehvesh M, et al. Plant-based meat alternatives: Compositional analysis, current development and challenges. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100154. [Google Scholar]
18.
Lentz G, Connelly S, Mirosa M, Jowett T. Gauging attitudes and behaviours: Meat consumption and potential reduction. Appetite 2018, 127, 230–241. [Google Scholar]
19.
Olabi A, Levitsky DA, Hunter JB, Spies R, Rovers AP, Abdouni L. Food and mood: A nutritional and mood assessment of a 30-day vegan space diet. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40, 110–115. [Google Scholar]
20.
Radnitz C, Beezhold B, DiMatteo J. Investigation of lifestyle choices of individuals following a vegan diet for health and ethical reasons. Appetite 2015, 90, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
21.
Miassi YE, Dossa FK, Zannou O, Akdemir Ş, Koca I. Socio-cultural and economic factors affecting the choice of food diet in West Africa: a two‑stage Heckman approach. Discov. Food 2022, 2, 16. [Google Scholar]
22.
Dusbosq R. We Can’t Keep Meating Like This: Attitudes towards Vegetarian and Vegan Diets in the United Kingdom. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6844. [Google Scholar]
23.
Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 2011, 478, 7369. [Google Scholar]
24.
Peyraud F, Italiano A. Combined PARP Inhibition and Immune Checkpoint Therapy in Solid Tumors. Cancers 2020, 12, 1502. [Google Scholar]
25.
Mordor Intelligence. European Plant Protein Market: Growth, Trends, Impact of COVID-19 and Forecasts (2022–2027). Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/fr (accessed on 30 July 2023).
26.
Miassi YE, Dossa KF. Forecasting animal protein supply in Asia and Europe in light of climate change, population growth and land pressure. Trop. Plants 2023, 2, 22. [Google Scholar]
27.
Néo P. Protein Powerhouse: Asia the ‘Key Protein Market’ by 2025 with China and India Leading the Charge. 2019. Available online: https://www.foodnavigator-asia.com/ (accessed on 30 July 2023).
28.
Mordor Intelligence. Asia-Pacific Animal Protein Market Size, Sharing, Impact of COVID-19 and Forecasts to 2029. 2020. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/fr (accessed on 30 July 2023).
29.
Qi Z, Zhou X, Tian L, Zhang H, Cai L, Tang F. Distribution of mycotoxin-producing fungi across major rice production areas of China. Food Control 2022, 134, 108572. [Google Scholar]
30.
Wang H, Chen Q, Zhu C, Bao J. Paying for the Greater Good? —What Information Matters for Beijing Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Plant-Based Meat? Foods 2022, 11, 2460. [Google Scholar]
31.
Zhang M, Li L, Bai J. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in urban areas of three cities in China. Food Control 2020, 118, 107390. [Google Scholar]
32.
Liu J, Hocquette É, Ellies-Oury M-P, Chriki S, Hocquette JF. Chinese Consumers’ Attitudes and Potential Acceptance toward Artificial Meat. Foods 2021, 10, 353. [Google Scholar]
33.
Marie-Laure AG. EPRS R: European Parliament Research Service, Research Service for Members. 2020. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-Members-Research-Service-presentation.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2024).
34.
Tchaker FZ. Ecotoxicology and Residue Analysis; République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire: Polycopie de cours; University of Médéa: Medea, Algeria, 2021.
35.
Sultan B, Roudier P, Traoré S. Chapter 10. The impacts of climate change on crop yields in West Africa. In Rural Societies in the Face of Climatic and Environmental Changes in West Africa; IRD Éditions: Marseille, France, 2015; pp. 199–214.
36.
FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2017.
37.
Kaabache R. Determinants and Incidence of animal protein consumption, the case of Algeria. Tribut. J. 2019, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
38.
FAO. Livestock and the Environment| FAO. Available online: https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/fr/c/1618251/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
39.
Greenpeace. Agriculture: Too Much Farmland Is Used for Livestock Farming in Europe. 2019. Available online: https://www.greenpeace.fr/espace-presse/ (accessed on 31 July 2023).
40.
FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020.
41.
Caillavet F, Fadhuile A, Nichèle V. L’évolution de la consommation de produits animaux en France : de multiples enjeux. INRA Prod. Anim. 2019, 32, 131–146. [Google Scholar]
42.
OCDE/FAO. Statistiques Agricoles de l’OCDE. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr-outl-data-fr (accessed on 6 January 2024).
43.
Sakli FAOUZI | Professor (Full) | PhD, Dr.Es-Sc. | Textile Engineering | Research profile. ResearchGate. Available online:  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sakli-Faouzi (accessed on 7 January 2024).
44.
Ravand H, Baghaei P. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling with R. Pract. Assess Res. Eval. 2019, 21, 11. [Google Scholar]
45.
Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2004.
46.
Hair J, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–151. [Google Scholar]
47.
Jakobowicz E. Contributions to Latent Variable Structural Equation Models; Conservatoire National des Arts et Metiers: Paris, France, 2007; pp. 1–206.
48.
Balah A. Amany Balah’s Research Works|Al-Azhar University, Cairo and OTHER places. ResearchGate. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Amany-Balah-15953460 (accessed on 7 January 2024).
49.
Météo France. Extreme rainfall in mainland France. 2023. Available online: https://meteofrance.fr/actualite/presse/ (accessed on 30 July 2023).
50.
EEA 2021: The Year in Brief—European Environment Agency. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/EEA-2021-the-year-in-brief (accessed on 7 January 2024).
51.
Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Klein Tank AMG, Klok EJ, Jones PD, New M. A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, D20119. [Google Scholar]
52.
U. N. Environment. UNEP Annual Report: Letter from the Executive Director - 2019 in review. UNEP - UN Environment Programme. Available online: https://www.unenvironment.org/annualreport/2019/index.php (accessed on 7 January 2024).
53.
IPCC. IPCC Synthesis Report: The Risks Are Much Higher than in Previous Forecasts. Climate Change: Observed Changes. Synthesis Reports. 2023. Available online: https://climat.be/ (accessed on 31 July 2023).
54.
Meseguer-Ruiz O, Cantos JO. Climate change in two Mediterranean climate areas (Spain and Chile): evidences and projections. Investig. Geogr. 2023, 79, 9–31. [Google Scholar]
55.
Chazarra-Bernabé A, Lorenzo Mariño B, Romero Fresneda R, Moreno García JV. Evolución de los climas de Köppen en España en el periodo 1951-2020 - Agencia Estatal de Meteorología - AEMET. Gobierno de España. Available online: https://doi.org/10.31978/666-22-011-4 (accessed on 5 January 2024).
56.
Citepa. Méthane : la Commission présente une proposition de règlement visant à réduire les émissions dans le secteur de l’énergie. Citepa. Available online: https://www.citepa.org/fr/2022_01_a06/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
57.
UN. Five Things You Need to Know about the Greenhouse Gases that Are Warming the Planet. Available online: https://news.un.org/fr/story/2022/01/1124652 (accessed on 31 July 2023).
58.
Stern JP. Methane Emissions from Natural Gas and LNG Imports: an increasingly urgent issue for the future of gas in Europe. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Available online: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/methane-emissions-from-natural-gas-and-lng-imports-an-increasingly-urgent-issue-for-the-future-of-gas-in-europe/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
59.
“Figure 3: From Saunois et al. (2020). Global methane budget in years.... ResearchGate. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/From-Saunois-et-al-2020-Global-methane-budget-in-years-2008-2017-in-environment_fig3_354985015 (accessed on 7 January 2024).
60.
Qi S, Song B, Liu C, Gong P, Luo J, Zhang M, et al. Bamboo Forest Mapping in China Using the Dense Landsat 8 Image Archive and Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 762. [Google Scholar]
61.
González-Sánchez EJ, Ordóñez-Fernández R, Carbonell-Bojollo R, Veroz-González O, Gil-Ribes JA. Meta-analysis on atmospheric carbon capture in Spain through the use of conservation agriculture. Soil Tillage Res. 2012, 122, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
62.
OECD. ‘L’empreinte Carbone des Français Reste Stable; Commissariat Général au Développement Durable: Paris, France, 2020.
63.
Ali I, Sun H, Tariq G, Ali H, Baz K, Mahmood H, et al. Asymmetric impact of coal and gas on carbon dioxide emission in six Asian countries: Using asymmetric and non-linear approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 367, 132934. [Google Scholar]
64.
GIIGNL Annual Report. Who Are the World’s Leading LNG Exporters? 2021. Available online: https://giignl.org/giignl-releases-2023-annual-report/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
65.
Bloom DE. Population 2020: Demographics can be Potent Driver of Pace & Process of Economic Development.” 2020. Available online: https://www.globalissues.org/news/2020/03/17/26204 (accessed on 5 January 2024).
66.
Cheshire PC, Magrini S. Population growth in European cities: Weather matters – but only nationally. Reg. Stud. 2006, 40, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
67.
Bouzou N. Demography: why the (global) decline in the birth rate is a problem. 2021. Available online: https://www.europe1.fr/politique/baisse-de-la-natalite-une-transition-demographique-mondiale-4080914 (accessed on 6 January 2024).
68.
Jouve P. Agrarian transition: population growth, an opportunity or a constraint? Afr. Contemp. 2006, 217, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
69.
Larrère C. Nature in the city: a conversation between a philosopher and an architect. The Conversation. Available online: https://theconversation.com/de-la-nature-en-ville-conversation-entre-une-philosophe-et-un-architecte-110370 (accessed on 6 January 2024).
70.
INSEE. INSEE Flash Corse n°63 - Novembre 2021 - Direction régionale de l’économie, de l’emploi, du travail et des solidarités (DREETS).” Available online: https://corse.dreets.gouv.fr/INSEE-Flash-Corse-no63-Novembre-2021 (accessed on 7 January 2024).
71.
UNCTAD. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Report, 2021. Available online: https://unctad.org/topic/investment/world-investment-report (accessed on 6 January 2024).
72.
Cuq J. Plant Proteins as Alternatives to Animal Proteins. How to Increase Their LEVEL of quality? Académie des Sciences et Lettres de Montpellier : Montpellier, France, 2018; pp. 1–16.
73.
European Commission. Commission reports on development of plant proteins in the EU. European Commission - European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_6495 (accessed on 6 January 2024).
74.
Porter M. Population explosion: causes, consequences, benefits, drawbacks. Available online: https://fr1.warbletoncouncil.org/ (accessed on 31 July 2023).
75.
Clark G, Moonen T, Nunley J. Europe and its Urban Development, 1970 to 2020. Available online: https://www.eib.org/en/essays/the-story-of-your-city (accessed on 6 January 2024).
76.
Ponka R, Goudoum A, Tchungouelieu AC, Fokou E. Evaluation nutritionnelle de quelques ingrédients entrant dans la formulation alimentaire des poules pondeuses et porcs d’une ferme d’élevage au Nord- Ouest Cameroun. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 10, 5. [Google Scholar]
77.
Shahbandeh M. Major rice importing countries worldwide 2022/2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/255948/top-rice-exporting-countries-worldwide-2011/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
78.
Atlas B. World Soybean Production by Country. Available online: https://www.atlasbig.com/ (accessed on 5 January 2024).
79.
Foundations Louis Bonduelle. How to Help People in Precarious Situations while Combating Food Waste. 2022. Available online: https://www.fondation-louisbonduelle.org/en/2022/09/28/help-citizens-in-need-fighting-against-food-waste/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
80.
Diallo MF, Dahmane M, Gadekar M, Schill C. The chemical structure of the compound. ResearchGate. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-chemical-structure-of-the-compound-Diallo-et-al-2021_fig2_362857179 (accessed on 7 January 2024).
81.
Bessemoulin P, Boucher O. Les besoins en observations pour la climatologie. Météorologie 2002, 8, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
82.
Aiking H. Protein production: planet, profit, plus people? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 483S–489S. [Google Scholar]
83.

Worlwide Data. News, Statistics and Data from All European Countries. Available online: www.donneesmondiales.com (accessed on 29 July 2023).

84.
Bilodeau. Expliquer les écarts de santé mentale entre les hommes et les femmes en emploi: l’effet du genre. 2018. Available online: https://socio.umontreal.ca/departement/nouvelles-evenements/une-nouvelle/news/detail/News/soutenance-de-these-de-doctorat-jaunathan-bilodeau-1er-mars-2018/ (accessed on 7 January 2024).
85.
Rosental PA. La biopolitique à l’épreuve de la croissance démographique mondiale. La vie des idées 2009, 1–10. Available online: https://laviedesidees.fr/La-biopolitique-a-l-epreuve-de-la (accessed on 6 January 2024). 
86.
PNSS. PNNS 2017-2021 : Révision des repères nutritionnels pour les adultes - Quoi dans mon assiette. Available online: https://quoidansmonassiette.fr/pnns-2017-2021-revision-des-reperes-nutritionnels-pour-les-adultes/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
Creative Commons

© 2024 by the authors; licensee SCIEPublish, SCISCAN co. Ltd. This article is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).