Transforming Urban-Rural Relations in Metropolitan Regions

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2026.

Guest Editors (2)

Tao  Liu
Prof. Dr. Tao Liu 
1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 2. Center for Urban Future Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Interests: Migration; Urbanization; Urban Land Development; Rural Transformation; Spatial Planning; Water Governance
Rongxi  Peng
Prof. Dr. Rongxi Peng 
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Interests: Migration; Urbanization; Rural Transformation; Rural Sustainable Development

Special Issue Information

Urban and rural areas are inherently interdependent, existing in a dynamic relationship rather than in isolation. Cities rely on rural areas for resources, labor, and ecological support, while rural areas benefit from urban markets, employment opportunities, infrastructure, and technological advancements. These relationships have continuously evolved alongside urbanization, becoming especially complex and multifaceted in metropolitan regions.

The evolving relations between urban and rural areas are reshaping the economic, social, ecological, and environmental landscapes of metropolitan regions. Over the past few decades, the urban-rural dichotomy has transformed into a continuum, with urban and rural functions increasingly integrating. The traditionally city-centered core-periphery connection has become bidirectional, resulting in a greater blending of distinct urban and rural spaces. The intensified flows of people, goods, capital, and information between these areas have not only redefined urban-rural relations but also transformed the concepts of urbanism and rurality in metropolitan contexts.

These changes in urban-rural relations have significantly impacted rural development trajectories. Some rural regions have leveraged their unique environmental or cultural resources to promote tourism, while others have cultivated specialized agricultural or manufacturing sectors or have transitioned into service-oriented economies. All these developments are closely linked to the evolving urban-rural dynamics within the broader context of metropolitan development. Therefore, grasping the diverse nature of urban-rural relations is crucial for understanding the dynamic evolution of rural development and for promoting balanced, coordinated, and sustainable regional development in metropolitan areas.

While urban-rural relations in metropolitan areas around the world are experiencing significant changes, they also display considerable diversity in their functional and spatial characteristics, shaped by varying geographic, institutional, economic, and cultural contexts globally. These dynamics and diversities have spurred ongoing theoretical and empirical inquiries from scholars across multiple disciplines, including geography, urban and rural planning, sociology, and others. In practice, urban-rural relations have also emerged as a central theme of interest in the field of global regional governance.

In light of this, we propose a Special Issue titled "Transforming Urban-Rural Relations in Metropolitan Regions." This issue seeks to investigate the processes of urban-rural transformation from multidisciplinary viewpoints, analyze the various modes of urban-rural interactions around the world, assess their impacts on both metropolitan and rural development, and share localized governance practices that foster sustainable and inclusive development through urban-rural integration in metropolitan areas.

Topics include but are not limited to:
Population mobility between urban and rural areas
Urban-rural land use changes in metropolitan regions
Diversification of industries in rural areas within metropolitan contexts
Social restructuring within urban-rural systems
The impact of new technologies on urban-rural relations
Theoretical advancements in understanding urban-rural relations in metropolitan areas
Rural governance practices in metropolitan regions

Published Papers (1 Papers)

Open Access

Article

01 June 2026

Regional Inequalities in Age at First Marriage: Evidence from Rural and Urban Howrah, India

The present study aimed to examines regional inequalities in age at first marriage among Bengali-speaking women in Howrah district, West Bengal, It hypothesized that women in urban areas were more likely to marry after 18 years compared to rural women. The analysis draws on cross-sectional data collected from 665 ever-married women, of whom 60.15% resided in urban areas and 39.85% in rural areas. Bivariate analysis, independent sample t-tests, and binary logistic regression were employed, complemented by qualitative in-depth interviews from each region. The mean age at marriage was 22.25 years (±4.4), with a pronounced rural–urban regional difference: rural women married significantly earlier (19.83 years) than urban women (23.85 years) (t = 12.80; p < 0.001). Nearly 48.30% of rural women were married at or below 18 years, compared to only 7.25% of urban women (p < 0.001). Logistic regression results reveal strong and persistent regional disparities. In the unadjusted Model I, urban women had significantly higher odds of marrying after 18 years than rural women (OR = 11.95; p < 0.001). After adjusting for socio-demographic, familial, and economic factors in Model II, the association remained robust (OR = 9.67; p < 0.001). Generational patterns were non linear: women from Generation II were more likely to marry after 18 years (OR = 1.09; p < 0.01), while those from Generation III had significantly lower odds (OR = 0.39; p < 0.01). Higher education of respondents (OR = 1.66; p < 0.01), respondents’ fathers (OR = 3.12; p < 0.01), and mothers (OR = 3.58; p < 0.01) substantially increased the likelihood of delayed marriage. Respondents (OR = 1.51; p < 0.05) and respondents’ fathers (OR = 1.92; p < 0.05) with white-collar jobs significantly increase the likelihood of being delayed in marriage. Respondents belonging to the upper wealth quintile (OR = 1.92; p < 0.05) were more likely to marry at later ages. Respondents with ≥3 siblings(OR = 0.65; p < 0.05)and those whose husbands had 1–2 siblings (OR = 0.37; p < 0.01) and ≥3 siblings (OR = 0.39; p < 0.01) were significantly less likely to marry after 18 years compared to the reference category. The qualitative findings reveal the intersection of socio-cultural and kinship obligation in marital timing. The finding underscores that delaying marriage requires interventions beyond legal enforcement and schooling alone, highlighting the need for rural-specific, intergenerational, and economically grounded policy strategies.

Mir  AzadKalam*
Saptamita Pal
Rural Reg. Dev.
2026,
4
(2), 10015; 
TOP