courses-img1News
International Respiratory Medicine Conference 2024 JEMP2024 NextGen Omics US 2025 A Topic Collection Dedicated to JEMP 2024 9th Asian Conference on Civil, Material and Environmental Science The 4th Climate, Weather and Water Forum International Conference of the German Society for Plant Sciences Emerging concepts and Novel Mechanisms in Organ Fibrosis Workshop ECB-IBS 2024 Five Editors-in-Chief Featured in the List of "Highly Cited
Sign in Register Submit

Journals Article Details

Rural and Regional Development -logo
Submit to RRD
Article Open Access

Community Sport, Australian Sport Policy and Advocacy: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives

Rural and Regional Development . 2024, 2(2), 10006; https://doi.org/10.35534/rrd.2024.10006
Charles Mountifield *   
Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 03 Feb 2024    Accepted: 15 Mar 2024    Published: 22 Mar 2024   

Full-Text HTML Full-Text PDF Download PDF

Abstract

This article explored aspects of the community sport policy process in rural New South Wales, Australia, focusing on the views of community sport club (CSC) officials relating to policy matters. Community sport represents a complicated policy arena, and rural communities face a level of disparity compared with better-resourced urban CSCs, particularly concerning policy implementation and advocacy issues. Officials at CSCs from ten different sports (n = 10) in a rural setting participated in semi-structured interviews to pinpoint themes common in the community sport policy process. Further, the research identified aspects of the connections that impact CSCs, including those with government and National Sporting Organisations (NSOs). To highlight the beliefs and attitudes of the CSC officials, the interviews had two key thematic foci—implementation and advocacy—and the findings highlighted sub-themes relating to the fundamental interests of CSCs. Overall, the research accentuated the hierarchical nature—a power imbalance—of sport policy processes, the potential for CSCs to have a bottom-up role in policy creation, and the consideration of a policy analysis and evaluation structure such as the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Finally, the outcome points to enthusiasm for strengthening community sport by giving CSCs a voice through localized advocacy.

Keywords

Advocacy; Community sport; Clubs; Policy; Power; Sustainability

References

1.
Green M, Houlihan B. Advocacy coalitions and elite sport policy change in Canada and the United Kingdom. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2004, 39, 387–403. [Google Scholar]
2.
Rossi L, Feiler S, Dallmeyer S, Breuer C. Organizational capacity building in non-profit sport clubs: exploring the role of competition as a capacity building stimulus. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2023, 1–19, doi:10.1080/16184742.2023.2203191
3.
Doherty A, Cuskelly G. Organizational capacity and performance of community sport clubs. J. Sport Manag. 2019, 34, 240–259. [Google Scholar]
4.
Schaillée H, Haudenhuyse R, Bradt L. Community sport and social inclusion: International perspectives. Sport Soc. 2019, 22, 885–896. [Google Scholar]
5.
Pedersen PM, Thibault L. Contemporary Sport Management; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA. 2018.
6.
Green M. An Analysis of Elite Sport Policy Change in Three Sports in Canada and the United Kingdom; Loughborough University: Loughborugh, UK, 2003.
7.
Houlihan B, White A. The Politics of Sports Development: Development of Sport or Development through Sport? Psychology Press: London, UK 2002.
8.
McDonald I. Sport for All-‘RIP’. A political critique of the relationship between national sport policy and local authority sports development in London. Publ. Leis. Stud. Assoc. 1995, 55, 71–94. [Google Scholar]
9.
Misener K, Doherty A. Understanding capacity through the processes and outcomes of interorganizational relationships in nonprofit community sport organizations. Sport Manag. Rev. 2013, 16, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
10.
Roche M. Sport and community: Rhetoric and reality in the development of British sport policy. In Sport, Culture and Politics; Binfield JC, Stevenson J, Eds; Sheffield Academic Press: Sheffield, UK, 1993; pp. 72–112.
11.
Shilbury D. Considering future sport delivery systems. Sport Manag. Rev. 2000, 3, 199–221. [Google Scholar]
12.
Skille EÅ. Community and sport in Norway: Between state sport policy and local sport clubs. Int. J. Sport Policy Polit. 2015, 7, 505–518. [Google Scholar]
13.
Houlihan B, Green M. Modernization and sport: The reform of Sport England and UK Sport. Public Adm. 2009, 87, 678–698. [Google Scholar]
14.
Houlihan B. Sport policy making. In Routledge Handbook of Sport and Politics; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; pp. 16–27.
15.
Tonts M, Atherley K. Competitive sport and the construction of place identity in rural Australia. Sport Soc. 2010, 13, 381–398. [Google Scholar]
16.
Tonts M, Atherley K. Rural restructuring and the changing geography of competitive sport. Aust. Geogr. 2005, 36, 125–144. [Google Scholar]
17.
Spaaij R. The glue that holds the community together? Sport and sustainability in rural Australia. Sport Soc. 2009, 12, 1132–1146. [Google Scholar]
18.
Berry NM, Coffee NT, Nolan R, Dollman J, Sugiyama T. Neighbourhood environmental attributes associated with walking in south Australian adults: Differences between urban and rural areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 965. [Google Scholar]
19.
Holden R, Zhang J. The Economic Impact of Improving Regional, Rural & Remote Education in Australia; Gonski Intitute for Education, UNSW Sydney: Sydney, Australia, 2018.
20.
Eversole R, Walo M. Leading and following in Australian regional development: Why governance matters. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 2020, 12, 291–302. [Google Scholar]
21.
Lane MS, Tiwari S, Alam K. The supply and use of broadband in rural Australia: An explanatory case study of the western downs region. Aust. J. Inf. Syst. 2016, 20. doi:10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1202.
22.
Shortall S, Alston M. To rural proof or not to rural proof: A comparative analysis. Polit. Policy 2016, 44, 35–55. [Google Scholar]
23.
Rich K, Misener L. Playing on the periphery: Troubling sport policy, systemic exclusion and the role of sport in rural Canada. Sport Soc. 2019, 22, 1005–1024. [Google Scholar]
24.
Spaaij R. The ambiguities of sport and community engagement. Ethos 2012, 21, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
25.
MacCarthy M, Morgan A, Lambert C. Congregating as a social phenomenon; the social glue that binds. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2022, 13, 235–246. [Google Scholar]
26.
Moustakas L. Sport for Social Cohesion: Transferring from the Pitch to the Community? Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 513. [Google Scholar]
27.
Schulenkorf N, Sherry E, Rowe K. Sport for development: An integrated literature review. J. Sport Manag. 2016, 30, 22–39. [Google Scholar]
28.
Robertson J, Eime R, Westerbeek H. Community sports clubs: are they only about playing sport, or do they have broader health promotion and social responsibilities? Ann. Leis. Res. 2019, 22, 215–232. [Google Scholar]
29.
Doherty A, Millar P, Misener K. Return to community sport: Leaning on evidence in turbulent times. Manag. Sport Leis. 2022, 27, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
30.
Frisby W, Ponic P. Sport and social inclusion. In Sport Policy in Canada; University of Ottawa Press: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2013; pp. 381–403.
31.
Zhou L, Wang JJ, Chen X, Cianfrone B, Pifer ND. Community-sport service provision, participant satisfaction, and participation. Int. J. Sport Mark. Spons. 2019, 21, 127–147. [Google Scholar]
32.
Tonts M. Competitive sport and social capital in rural Australia. J. Rural Stud. 2005, 21, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
33.
de Jong J, Kubbinga C, Selker J, Leistra S, Pruim A. Sport, Physical Education and Coaching in Health (SPEACH): SPEACH: supporting physical education teachers and sports coaches to promote an active and healthy lifestyle. Available online: http://speach.hanze.nl/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
34.
Simon RL. Internalism and internal values in sport. J. Philos. Sport 2000, 27, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
35.
Collins MF, Collins M, Kay T. Sport and Social Exclusion; Routledge: London, UK, 2014.
36.
Hill M, Hupe P. Implementing Public Policy, 2nd ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2009.
37.
Cairney P. Understanding public policy: Theories and issues.  Publ. Adm. 2013, 91, 782–793. [Google Scholar]
38.
Howlett M, McConnell A, Perl A. Weaving the fabric of public policies: comparing and integrating contemporary frameworks for the study of policy processes. J. Comp. Pol. Anal. Res. Pract. 2016, 18, 273–289. [Google Scholar]
39.
Strittmatter A-M, Stenling C, Fahlén J, Skille E. Sport policy analysis revisited: the sport policy process as an interlinked chain of legitimating acts. Int. J. Sport Policy Polit. 2018, 10, 621–635. [Google Scholar]
40.
Mintzberg H. Developing Theory about the Development of Theory. In Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 355–372. 
41.
Cashman R. Paradise of Sport: A History of Australian Sport; Walla Walla Press: Sydney, Australia, 2010.
42.
Eime R, Harvey J, Charity M, Payne W. Population levels of sport participation: Implications for sport policy. BMC Publ. Health 2016, 16, 752. [Google Scholar]
43.
Nichols G, Wicker P, Cuskelly G, Breuer C. Measuring the formalization of community sports clubs: Findings from the UK, Germany and Australia. Int. J. Sport Policy Polit. 2015, 7, 283–300. [Google Scholar]
44.
Shilbury D, Karg A, Rowe K, Phillips P. Sport Management in Australia: An Organisational Overview; Routledge: London, UK, 2020.
45.
Jeanes R, Spaaij R, Magee J, Farquharson K, Gorman S, Lusher D. ‘Yes we are inclusive’: Examining provision for young people with disabilities in community sport clubs. Sport Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 38–50. [Google Scholar]
46.
Jenkin, C., Eime R, van Uffelen J, Westerbeek H. How to re-engage older adults in community sport? Reasons for drop-out and re-engagement. Leisure Stud. 2021, 40, 441–453. [Google Scholar]
47.
Bauman AE, Nau T, Cassidy S, Gilbert S, Bellew W, Smith BJ. Physical activity surveillance in Australia: standardisation is overdue. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2021, 45, 189–192. [Google Scholar]
48.
Spaaij R, Magee J, Farquharson K, Gorman S, Jeanes R, Lusher D, et al. Diversity work in community sport organizations: Commitment, resistance and institutional change. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2018, 53, 278–295. [Google Scholar]
49.
Mountifield C, Sharpe S. COVID-19 and the Decline of Volunteers in Australian Community Sport: Solutions to Move Forward. In Research Handbook on Sport and COVID-19; Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 312–327.
50.
Schulenkorf N, Siefken K. Managing sport-for-development and healthy lifestyles: The sport-for-health model. Sport Manag. Rev. 2019, 22, 96–107. [Google Scholar]
51.
Van der Veken K, Lauwerier E, Willems SJ. How community sport programs may improve the health of vulnerable population groups: A program theory. Int. J. Equity. Health 2020, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
52.
Jeanes R, Spaaij R, Penney D, O’Connor J. Managing informal sport participation: tensions and opportunities. Int. J. Sport Policy P. 2019, 11, 79–95. [Google Scholar]
53.
Veal A, Toohey K, Frawley S. Sport participation, international sports events and the ‘trickle-down effect’. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events 2019, 11, s3–s7. [Google Scholar]
54.
Stylianou M, Hogan A, Enright E. Youth sport policy: The enactment and possibilities of ‘soft policy’in schools. Sport Educ. Soc. 2019, 24, 182–194. [Google Scholar]
55.
Jenkins-Smith HC, Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. Theor. Policy Process 1999, 118, 117–166. [Google Scholar]
56.
Hjern B, Porter DO. Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. In Realizing Social Science Knowledge; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1983; pp. 265–277.
57.
Marsh D, Smith M. Understanding policy networks: towards a dialectical approach. Political Stud. 2000, 48, 4–21. [Google Scholar]
58.
Cuskelly G. Volunteering in community sport organizations: Implications for social capital. In Sport and Social Capital; Routledge: London, UK, 2008; pp. 187–203.
59.
Doherty A, Misener K. Community sport. In Sport and Social Capital; Routledge: London, UK, 2008; p. 113.
60.
Garvey D. Identification and impact of interorganizational dynamics faced by small nonprofits operating in collaborations. In Paper Presented at the 35th Annual Conference Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Chicago, USA, 16–18 November 2006.
61.
Gumulka G, Hay S, Lasby D. Building Blocks for Strong Communities; Human Resources and Social Development Canada: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2006.
62.
Light R. Coaches’ experiences of Game Sense: Opportunities and challenges. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedag. 2004, 9, 115–131. [Google Scholar]
63.
Rochester C. The role of boards in small voluntary organisations. In The Governance of Public and Non-Profit Organisations: What Do Boards Do; Routledge: London, UK, 2003; pp. 127–142.
64.
Wicker P, Breuer C. Scarcity of resources in German non-profit sport clubs. Sport Manag. Rev. 2011, 14, 188–201. [Google Scholar]
65.
Swierzy P, Wicker P, Breuer C. The impact of organizational capacity on voluntary engagement in sports clubs: A multi-level analysis. Sport Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 307–320. [Google Scholar]
66.
Hill S, Kerr R, Kobayashi K. Around the kitchen-table with Bourdieu: understanding the lack of formalization or professionalization of community sports clubs in New Zealand. Sport Soc. 2021, 24, 115–130. [Google Scholar]
67.
Spaaij R, Knoppers A, Jeanes R. “We want more diversity but…”: Resisting diversity in recreational sports clubs. Sport Manag. Rev. 2020, 23, 363–373. [Google Scholar]
68.
Geeraert A. A rational choice perspective on good governance in sport: The necessity of rules of the game. In Good Governance in Sport; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 15–29.
69.
Tacon R, Walters G. The promises and pitfalls of codification of governance in sport as legitimacy work. In Good Governance in Sport; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 221–235.
70.
Parent MM, Hoye R. The impact of governance principles on sport organisations’ governance practices and performance: A systematic review. Cogent. Soc. Sci. 2018, 4, 1503578. [Google Scholar]
71.
Chappelet J-L, Mrkonjic M. Assessing sport governance principles and indicators. In Research Handbook on Sport Governance; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019; pp. 10–28.
72.
Cuskelly G. Volunteer retention in community sport organisations. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2004, 4, 59–76. [Google Scholar]
73.
Edwards MB, Rowe K. Managing sport for health: An introduction to the special issue. Sport Manag. Rev. 2019, 22, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
74.
Doherty A, Misener K, Cuskelly G. Toward a multidimensional framework of capacity in community sport clubs. Nonprofit Volunt. Sec. Q. 2014, 43, 124S–142S. [Google Scholar]
75.
Hoye R, Cuskelly G, Auld C, Kappelides P, Misener K. Sport Volunteering; Routledge: London, UK, 2019.
76.
Skille EÅ. Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers: a theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organizations. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2008, 43, 181–200. [Google Scholar]
77.
May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement. Sci. 2013, 8, 18. [Google Scholar]
78.
Donaldson A, Leggett S, Finch CF. Sports policy development and implementation in context: researching and understanding the perceptions of community end-users. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2012, 47, 743–760. [Google Scholar]
79.
Skille E, Stenling C. Inside-out and outside-in: Applying the concept of conventions in the analysis of policy implementation through sport clubs. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2018, 53, 837–853. [Google Scholar]
80.
Horne J, Tomlinson A, Whannel G. Understanding Sport: An Introduction to the Sociological and Cultural Analysis of Sport; Routledge: London, UK, 1999.
81.
Foucault M, Faubion JD. Power: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984. Vol. 3; Penguin: London, UK, 2000.
82.
Conway JM, Osterweil M, Thorburn E. Theorizing Power, Difference and the Politics of Social Change: Problems and Possibilities in Assemblage Thinking (Introductory Essay).  Stud. Soc. Justice 2018, 12, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
83.
Houlihan B, Lindsey I. Networks and partnerships in sports development. In Management of Sports Development; Routledge: London, UK. 2008; pp. 225–241.
84.
Hindess B. Discourses of Power: from Hobbes to Foucault; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996.
85.
Foucault M. The subject and power. Crit. Inq. 1982, 8, 777–795. [Google Scholar]
86.
O’Farrell C. Michel Foucault; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2005; pp. 164–168.
87.
Stenling C. The Drive for Change: Putting the Means and Ends of Sport at Stake in the Organizing of Swedish Voluntary Sport; Umeå University: Umeå, Sweden, 2015.
88.
Skille EÅ. State sport policy and voluntary sport clubs: The case of the Norwegian sports city program as social policy. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2009, 9, 63–79. [Google Scholar]
89.
Edwards JR, Mason DS, Washington M. Institutional pressures, government funding and provincial sport organisations. Int. J. Sport Manag. Market. 2009, 6, 128–149. [Google Scholar]
90.
Slack T, Hinings B. Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organ. Stud. 1994, 15, 803–827. [Google Scholar]
91.
Sotiriadou P, Wicker P. Community sports clubs’ responses to institutional and resource dependence pressures for government grants. Ann. Leis. Res. 2013, 16, 297–314. [Google Scholar]
92.
Salancik GR, Pfeffer J. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
93.
Wicker P, Breuer C. How the economic and financial situation of the community affects sport clubs’ resources: Evidence from multi-level models. Int. J. Financ. Stud. 2015, 3, 31–48. [Google Scholar]
94.
Sheptak RD, Menaker BE. The frustration factor: Volunteer perspectives of frustration in a sport setting. VOLUNTAS: Int. J. Volunt. Nonprof. Organ. 2016, 27, 831–852. [Google Scholar]
95.
Linnell D. Evaluation of Capacity Building: Lessons from the Field Alliance for Nonprofit Management; DQCall: Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
96.
Taylor T, Darcy S, Hoye R, Cuskelly G. Using psychological contract theory to explore issues in effective volunteer management. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2006, 6, 123–147. [Google Scholar]
97.
Bang H, Ross S, Reio TG. From motivation to organizational commitment of volunteers in non‐profit sport organizations: The role of job satisfaction. J. Manag. Devel. 2013, 31, 96–112. [Google Scholar]
98.
Millar P, Doherty A. Readiness to build capacity in community sport organizations. Manag. Sport Leis. 2021, 26, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
99.
Pressman JL, Wildavsky A. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; University of California Press: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1984; Volume 708.
100.
O’Toole LJ. Rational choice and policy implementation: Implications for interorganizational network management. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 1995, 25, 43–57. [Google Scholar]
101.
Barrett S, Fudge C. Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy; Methuen: London, UK, 1981.
102.
Stokman FN, Zeggelink EP. Is politics power or policy oriented? A comparative analysis of dynamic access models in policy networks. J. Math. Sociol. 1996, 21, 77–111. [Google Scholar]
103.
Dewulf A, Elbers W. Power in and over cross-sector partnerships: Actor strategies for shaping collective decisions. Adm. Sci. 2018, 8, 43. [Google Scholar]
104.
Birkland TA. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making; Routledge: London, UK, 2019.
105.
Hicks D, Slaughter R. World Yearbook of Education 1998: Futures Education; Routledge: London, UK, 2012.
106.
Lavie D. The interconnected firm: Evolution, strategy, and performance. In Dissertations Available from ProQuest; University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004.
107.
Daft RL, Lewin AY. Perspective—Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organ. Sci. 2008, 19, 177–183. [Google Scholar]
108.
Wellstead A. Plus ça Change, Plus C’est La Même Chose? A review of Paul Sabatier’s “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein”. Policy Sci. 2017, 50, 549–561. [Google Scholar]
109.
Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 1988, 21, 129–168. [Google Scholar]
110.
Grix J, Brannagan PM, Grimes H, Neville R. The impact of Covid-19 on sport. Int. J. Sport Policy Politic 2020, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
111.
Cisneros P. The Advocacy Coalition Framework. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016.
112.
Pierce JJ, Giordono LS, Peterson HL, Hicks KC. Common approaches for studying advocacy: Review of methods and model practices of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 59, 139–158. [Google Scholar]
113.
Jenkins-Smith HC, Sabatier PA. Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. J. Public Policy 1994, 14, 175–203. [Google Scholar]
114.
Sabatier PA. Policy change over a decade or more. Policy Change Learn. 1993, 13, 33. [Google Scholar]
115.
Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 1998, 5, 98–130. [Google Scholar]
116.
Sabatier PA. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J. Public Policy 1986, 6, 21–48. [Google Scholar]
117.
Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. Theor. Policy Process 2014, 3, 183–224. [Google Scholar]
118.
Hylton K, Totten M. Community sports development. In Sports Development: Policy, Process and Practice; Routledge: London, UK, 2008; pp. 77–117.
119.
Book K, Svanborg Eden G. Malmö–the skateboarding city: A multi-level approach for developing and marketing a city through user-driven partnerships. Int. J. Sport Mark. Spons. 2021, 22, 164–178. [Google Scholar]
120.
King N. Sport Policy and Governance: Local Perspectives; Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2009.
121.
Aucoin P. Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance 1990, 3, 115–137. [Google Scholar]
122.
Blood G. The relationship between the Australian Olympic committee and the Australian sports commission. Sport. Tradit. 2018, 35, 55–77. [Google Scholar]
123.
Sam MP, Jackson SJ. Sport policy development in New Zealand: Paradoxes of an integrative paradigm. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2004, 39, 205–222. [Google Scholar]
124.
Eichberg H. Sport Cooperation Between Denmark and Tanzania: Development and Recognition. In Bodily Democracy; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 235–256.
125.
Elmore RF. Forward and Backword Mapping: Reversible Logic in the Analysis of Public Policy. In Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems; Springer: New York City, NY, USA 1985; pp. 33–70.
126.
Elmore R. Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decision. In Studying Implementation: Methodological and Administrative Issues; Chatham Publishing: Chatham, NJ, USA, 1982.
127.
Sætren H, Hupe PL. Policy implementation in an age of governance. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe; Springer: New York City, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 553–575.
128.
Elmore RF. Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Polit. Sci. Q. 1979, 94, 601–616. [Google Scholar]
129.
Sayer RA. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach; Psychology Press: London, UK, 1992.
130.
Smith B, Sparkes AC. Interviews: Qualitative interviewing in the sport and exercise sciences. In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; pp. 125–145.
131.
Evans AB, Barker-Ruchti N, Blackwell J, Clay G, Dowling F, Frydendal S. Qualitative research in sports studies: challenges, possibilities and the current state of play. Eur. J.Sport Soc. 2021, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
132.
Pringle R, Falcous M. Transformative research and epistemological hierarchies: Ruminating on how the sociology of the sport field could make more of a difference.  Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2018, 53, 261–277. [Google Scholar]
133.
Ronkainen NJ, Wiltshire G. Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: A realist perspective. Int. J. Sport Exercise Psychol. 2021, 19, 13–28. [Google Scholar]
134.
Morgan AM, Fernandez CE, Terry MA, Tjong V. A qualitative assessment of return to sport in collegiate athletes: does gender matter? Cureus 2020, 12, 9689. [Google Scholar]
135.
Guevara SA, Donaldson A, Keegan RJ, Appaneal RN, Smyth EA. Waddington G. Stakeholder insights into athlete attrition in the high-performance pathway. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2022, 25, 755–763. [Google Scholar]
136.
Mansfield L, Kay T, Anokye N, Fox-Rushby J. A qualitative investigation of the role of sport coaches in designing and delivering a complex community sport intervention for increasing physical activity and improving health. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1196. [Google Scholar]
137.
McCall A, Wolfberg A, Ivarsson A, Dupont G, Larocque A, Bilsborough J. A Qualitative Study of 11 World-Class Team-Sport Athletes’ Experiences Answering Subjective Questionnaires: A Key Ingredient for ‘Visible’ Health and Performance Monitoring? Sports Med. 2023, 53, 1085–1100. [Google Scholar]
138.
Jakobsson BT, Lundvall S. Learn, have fun and be healthy! An interview study of swedish teenagers’ views of participation in club sport. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6852. [Google Scholar]
139.
Kappelides P, Spoor J. Managing sport volunteers with a disability: Human resource management implications. Sport Manag. Rev. 2019, 22, 694–707. [Google Scholar]
140.
Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015.
141.
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2006.
142.
Harris P, Kent J, Sainsbury P, Marie-Thow A, Baum F, Friel S, et al. Creating ‘healthy built environment’legislation in Australia; a policy analysis. Health Promot. Int. 2018, 33, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar]
143.
Skinner J, Edwards A, Smith AC. Qualitative Research in Sport Management, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2021.
144.
Andrew DP, Pedersen PM, McEvoy CD. Research Methods and Design in Sport Management; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2019.
145.
Brinkmann S, Kvale S. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing; Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2015.
146.
Gratton C, Jones I. Theories, concepts and variables. In Research Methods for Sports Studies; Routledge: London, UK, 2010; pp. 21–24.
147.
Skinner J, Edwards A, Corbett B. Research Methods for Sport Management; Routledge: London, UK, 2014.
148.
Plas JM, Kvale S, KVALE SA. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1996.
149.
Williams M, Moser T. The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. Int. Manag. Rev. 2019, 15, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
150.
Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications Limited: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021.
151.
Dunn M, Thomas JO, Swift W, Burns L, Mattick RP. Drug testing in sport: The attitudes and experiences of elite athletes. Int. J. Drug Policy 2010, 21, 330–332. [Google Scholar]
152.
Lamont M, Hing N, Vitartas P. Affective response to gambling promotions during televised sport: A qualitative analysis. Sport Manag. Rev. 2016, 19, 319–331. [Google Scholar]
153.
Eagleman AM. Stereotypes of race and nationality: A qualitative analysis of sport magazine coverage of MLB players. J. Sport Manag. 2011, 25, 156–168. [Google Scholar]
154.
Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo; SAGE Publications Limited: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013.
155.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice; SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014.
156.
Kantner J, Lindsay DS. Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait. Memory Cognit. 2012, 40, 1163–1177. [Google Scholar]
157.
Kvale S. Ten standard objections to qualitative research interviews. J. Phenomenol. Psychol. 1994, 25, 147–173. [Google Scholar]
158.
Dowling M, Mackintosh C, Lee S, Allen J. Community Sport Development: Managing Change and Measuring Impact; Taylor & Francis: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 1–6.
159.
Hellmann K. Numbers and Narrative: The Subtle Art of Grant-Writing for Non-Profits. In Strategic Communication; Texas Christian University: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2023.
160.
Barnes M, Cousens L, MacLean J. Trust and collaborative ties in a community sport network. Manag. Sport Leis. 2017, 22, 310–324. [Google Scholar]
161.
Kim M, Zhang JJ, Connaughton D. Modification of the volunteer functions inventory for application in youth sports. Sport Manag. Rev. 2010, 13, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
162.
Drummond M, Elliott S, Drummond C, Prichard I. Youth sport and COVID-19: A potential generation lost. Emerald Open Res. 2020, 2, 27. [Google Scholar]
163.
Berger PL, Luckmann T. A Construção Social da Realidade: Tratado de Sociologia do Conhecimento. Vozes 2007, 12, 2. [Google Scholar]
164.
Guo C, Acar M. Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizationss: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprof. Volunt. Sec. Q. 2005, 34, 340–361. [Google Scholar]
165.
Cunningham-Smith V. Interagency collaboration: A mixed bag.  Dev. Pract. Child Youth Family Work J. 2004, 9, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
166.
Sullivan H, Skelcher C. Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services; Macmillan International Higher Education: New York City, NY, USA, 2017.
167.
Beckley TM, Martz D, Nadeau S, Wall E, Reimer B. Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: Delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. J. Rural Comm. Dev. 2008, 3, 56–75. [Google Scholar]
168.
Fahlén J, Skille EÅ. State sport policy for indigenous sport: inclusive ambitions and exclusive coalitions. Int. J. Sport Policy Polit. 2017, 9, 173–187. [Google Scholar]
169.
Halkyard T. Policy ‘Shapers’ or Policy ‘Takers’? The Case of Three Small-to-Mid-Sized National Governing Bodies of Olympic Sports in England; Loughborough University: Loughborough, UK, 2019.
170.
Houlihan B. Public sector sport policy: Developing a framework for analysis. Int.Rev. Sociol. Sport 2005, 40, 163–185. [Google Scholar]
171.
Harris S. An Analysis of the Significance of Sub-Regional Partnerships in the Community Sport Policy Process; Loughborough University: Loughborough, UK, 2014.
172.
Rose M. Sport Policy and Multilevel governance: A Case Study of Ontario and Quebec; University of Ottawa: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2006.
173.
Jedlicka SR, Harris S, Houlihan B. “Policy Analysis in Sport Management” Revisited: A Critique and Discussion. J. Sport Manag. 2022, 36, 521–533. [Google Scholar]
174.
Glickman NJ, Servon LJ. More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Hous. Policy Debate 1998, 9, 497–539. [Google Scholar]
175.
Babiak K, Thibault L.  Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprof. Volunt. Sec. Q. 2009, 38, 117–143. [Google Scholar]
176.
Cousens L, Barnes M, Stevens J, Mallen C, Bradish C. “Who’s Your Partner? Who’s Your Ally?” Exploring the Characteristics of Public, Private, and Voluntary Recreation Linkages. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 2006, 24, 32–55. [Google Scholar]
177.
Barnes M, Cousens L, MacLean J. From silos to synergies: A network perspective of the Canadian sport system. Int. J. Sport Manag. Market. 2007, 2, 555–571. [Google Scholar]
178.
Frisby W, Thibault L, Kikulis L. The organizational dynamics of under‐managed partnerships in leisure service departments. Leis. Stud. 2004, 23, 109–126. [Google Scholar]
179.
Hall M, Andrukow A, Barr C, Brock K, De Wit M, Embuldeniya D, et al. The capacity to serve. A Qualitative Study of the Challenges Facing Canada’s Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations, Toronto, Canadian Centre for Philanthropy, 2003. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237235529_A_Qualitative_Study_of_the_Challenges_Facing_Canada’s_Nonprofit_and_Voluntary_Organizations (accessed on 1 February 2024).
180.
Berrett T. The Sponsorship of Amateur Sport—Government, National Sport Organization, and Corporate Perspectives. Soc. Leis. 1993, 16, 323–346. [Google Scholar]
181.
Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 2003
182.
Stenling C, Sam M. Can sport clubs be represented? Pre-packed policy advocacy and the trade-offs for democratic responsiveness. Int. J. Sport Policy Polit. 2020, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
183.
Bradbury T, Mitchell R, Thorn K. Moving forward: business model solutions for amateur sport clubs. Manag. Sport Leis. 2020, 26, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
184.
Kohl H, Murray T, Salvo D. Foundations of Physical Activity and Public Health; Human Kinetics Publishers: Champaign, IL, USA, 2019.
Creative Commons

© 2024 by the authors; licensee SCIEPublish, SCISCAN co. Ltd. This article is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).