Article Open Access

Determining the Identity of Corpses Using Fingerprints: Results from Practice and Analysis of Process Used in the Republic of Serbia

Perspectives in Legal and Forensic Sciences. 2024, 1(1), 10003; https://doi.org/10.35534/plfs.2024.10003
1
Ministry of Interior, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases “Dedinje”, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
4
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 27 Dec 2023    Accepted: 24 Jan 2024    Published: 29 Jan 2024   

Abstract

In today’s world, when there is a constant fight against organized crime and terrorism, when we have cases of mass accidents (plane crashes, train crashes, buses, etc.), the constant need for precise and quick identification of persons is evident in these cases. When we have situations with a large number of dead in various conditions, as well as complete or only parts of the body being on the spot, there is a need to use scientific and forensic methods in order to find out the reliable identity of these people. Furthermore, there is a need, in some cases, to identify persons who committed suicide, were killed, or died a natural death (accidental death) and who do not have documents according to which their identity can be determined. The aim of this paper will, however, be to identify a group of persons who need to be identified, known as unidentified corpses. Method. Describe and discuss the way of determining identity based on dactyloscopic data, which provides accurate and unambiguous identification, using fingerprints. Results. The identity was determined in 1271 cases of unidentified corpses by dactyloscopic comparison of fingerprints with a database containing fingerprints of about 8,000,000 indisputably identified persons. It was confirmed in 1139 cases. Conclusion. The high degree of identification in our research, as much as 89.6%, makes this method rightly represented as a standard method for confirming a person’s identity.

References

1.
Law on Identity Card (LIC). Official Gazette Republic of Serbia, No. 62/2006, 36/2011 and 53/2021.
2.
Law on Health Care (LHC). Art 204, Para. 1, Official Gazette Republic of Serbia, No. 25/2019.
3.
Weiss D, Schwarting D, Heurich C, Waltke H. Lost but not forgotten: finding the nation’s missing. NIJ J. 2018, 279. Available online: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250702.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2023).
4.
Law on Police (LoP), Art. 77, Para. 1. Official Gazette Republic of Serbia, No. 6/2016, 24/2018 and 87/2018.
5.
National Institute of Justice (NIJa). Special report: Mass Fatality Incidents: A Guide for Human Forensic Identification, National Institute of Justice, 2005. Available online: https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/mass-fatality-incidents-guide-human-forensic-identification (accessed on 25 January 2023).
6.
New Jersey State Police (NJSP). Missing Persons Investigative Best Practices Protocol Unidentified Deceased Persons Investigative Guidelines, 2007. Available online: https://www.njsp.org/divorg/invest/pdf/mpi-best-practices-protocol-103008.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2023).
7.
Ritter N. Missing Persons and Unidentified Remains: The Nation’s Silent Mass Disaster. NIJ J. 2007, 256. Available online: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/missing-persons-and-unidentified-remains-nations-silent-mass-disaster (accessed on 3 March 2023).
8.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Missing people, DNA analysis and identification of human remains, A guide to best practice in armed conflicts and other situations of armed violence, 2009. Available online: https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/icrc_002_4010.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2023).
9.
State of California Department of Justice (SCDJ) (2020). Missing and Unidentified Persons Section. Available online: https://oag.ca.gov/missing/mups (accessed on 15 July 2023).
10.
National Institute of Justice (NIJb). Identifying Missing Persons and Unidentified Decedents, 2012. Available online: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/identifying-missing-persons-and-unidentified-decedents (accessed on 8 September 2023).
11.
Borovko SR, Korban VV, Kritskaya SV, Yeumenenka SA. Missing people: Problems of identification of unknown bodies using DNA database. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 2, 260–262. [Google Scholar]
12.
Home Office, UK. Forensic Information Database Service (FINDS): International DNA and Fingerprint Exchange Policy for the United Kingdom, 2020. Available online: https://www.gov.uk (accessed on 3 March 2023).
13.
Fieldhouse S, Stow K. The Identification of Missing Persons Using Fingerprints. In Handbook of Missing Persons; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 389–413.
14.
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (NYSDCJS). Identification of Unidentified Patients – Model Policy, Missing Persons Clearinghouse, 2017. Available online: https://ny.gov (3 March 2023).
15.
Popovic B, Bandjur MV, Raicevic A. Robust enhancement of fingerprint images obtained by ink method. Electron. Lett. 2010, 46, 1379–1380. [Google Scholar]
16.
Popovic B, Bandjur MV, Raicevic A. Robust fingerprint stimulation by directed filtering in Fourier’s name. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2011, 1, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
17.
Tutulugdžija A, Radovanović R, Lamovec J. Visualisation of latent fingerprints by electrochemical deposition of metallic thin films. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, Serbia, 7–9 November 2017; pp. 321–329.
18.
Popovic B. Fingerprint Minutiae Detection Based on Multiscale Directional Image. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Electronic, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia, 2011.
19.
Zaeri N. Minutiae-based Fingerprint Extraction and Recognition, Biometrics; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2011.
20.
Law on records and data processing in the field of internal affairs (LoRDPFIA), Art. 11, Para. 4, Official Gazette Republic of Serbia, No. 24/2018.
21.
Law on personal data protection (LoPDP), Art. 21, Para. 1, Official Gazette Republic of Serbia, No. 97/08, 104/09 - other law, 68/12 – decision of the CC and 107/12.
22.
Pinheiro J. Decay Process of a Cadaver. In Forensic Anthropology and Medicine; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 85–116.
23.
Rulebook on criminal-forensic registration (RoCFR), taking of other samples and criminal-forensic expertise and analysis, Official Gazette Republic of Serbia. No. 54/2017.
24.
Sakthimani M, Peranantham S. Autopsy based analysis of unidentified dead bodies in a tertiary care hospital of South India. J. Indian Acad. Forensic Med. 2019, 41, 30. [Google Scholar]
25.
Petrovic N, Stojicic S, Radovanovic R, Nikolic V, Petrovic M. Automated Fingerprint Identification System: with and without the Possibility of Correction of a Digitalised Image. Tech. Gazette 2022, 29, 2067–2073. [Google Scholar]
26.
Pradityo R, Herlambang H, Rahmasari H, Purwo G. The Disclosure of a Murder Case Using Fingerprint Identification Method: An Alternative. Unnes Law J. 2022, 8, 225–244. [Google Scholar]
Creative Commons

© 2024 by the authors; licensee SCIEPublish, SCISCAN co. Ltd. This article is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).