SCIEPublish

Drivers and Socio-Ecological Consequences of Human-Wildlife Conflict in Uttarakhand, India

Article Open Access

Drivers and Socio-Ecological Consequences of Human-Wildlife Conflict in Uttarakhand, India

Author Information
Department of Geography and Resource Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 25 May 2026 Revised: 22 July 2026 Accepted: 07 August 2026 Published: 13 August 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:10
Downloads:5
Ecol. Divers. 2026, 3(3), 10012; DOI: 10.70322/ecoldivers.2026.10012
ABSTRACT: This paper examines the factors that affect human–wildlife conflict and its socio-ecological consequences, including impacts on the daily lives of rural people, farming activities, children’s schooling, and livestock rearing. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were employed. Data were collected from secondary sources, primarily the Uttarakhand State Forest Department and the Forest Survey of India, covering 25 years (2000–2025). Information on wildlife species, their populations, and the number of people killed or injured by wildlife was obtained. The author visited some affected areas of human–wildlife conflict in July 2024 and January 2025. A perception study was conducted in which 212 people from five villages were interviewed. A map of human–wildlife conflict hotspots was also prepared. Three districts of Uttarakhand—Pauri, Almora, and Tehri—were identified as human-wildlife conflict hotspots. This study reveals that elephants dominate the plains—namely the Doon Valley and the Tarai region—whereas leopards and bears dominate the middle Himalayan region in terms of human–wildlife conflict. Wild boars and langurs are also found in the same region. Snow leopards are confined to the Greater Himalayan region. Every day, one or more people are killed by wildlife, and the number of injured people is considerably high. Fatalities from leopard attacks are highest, followed by bear attacks, mainly in the middle Himalayan region. The study suggests that both the Forest Department and local communities can play significant roles in managing wildlife through awareness programmes and improved forest management.
Keywords: Human-wildlife conflict; Divers; Socio-ecological consequences; Uttarakhand
TOP