SCIEPublish

Machine Learning Approaches to Identify and Classify ADHD: A Narrative Review with Tabular Performance Synthesis and Human–AI Mapping

Review Open Access

Machine Learning Approaches to Identify and Classify ADHD: A Narrative Review with Tabular Performance Synthesis and Human–AI Mapping

Author Information
1
Department of Marriage and Family Sciences, JFK School of Psychology & Social Sciences, National University, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
2
School of Counselor Education, Adams State University, Alamosa, CO 81101, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: 31 January 2026 Revised: 04 March 2026 Accepted: 20 May 2026 Published: 01 June 2026

Creative Commons

© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views:11
Downloads:5
Lifespan Dev. Ment. Health 2026, 2(2), 10012; DOI: 10.70322/ldmh.2026.10012
ABSTRACT: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) presents diagnostic challenges due to heterogeneity, comorbidity rates, and reliance on subjective, phenomenological criteria, resulting in misdiagnosis or treatment delays. This structured narrative review with quantitative tabular synthesis, conceptual mapping, and clinical workflow integration employed a sunflower life-cycle metaphor to bridge clinical expertise and machine learning (ML) technologies, while surveying recent empirical studies (2017–2023) to capture methodological variation in ADHD assessment workflows. Ten studies were selected based on relevance to ML applications for ADHD identification and classification, with deliberate representation of diversity in study design, sample characteristics, data modalities, and ML model-type. The method comprised (a) broad interpretive literature searches, (b) extraction of study-level data, and (c) mapping of ML approaches onto a standardized evidence-based ADHD assessment workflow. Analyses included qualitative synthesis of sample characteristics (youth-focused, N = 38–238,696), data modalities (behavioral surveys, EHR, neuroimaging, genetics), ML models (RF, SVM, DNN), performance metrics, phenotype- and genotype-based distinctions; quantitative aggregation of reported performance metrics (accuracy 66–93%, AUC 0.66–0.94); cross-validation practice, and model-level considerations; and tabular summarization of limitations and multidimensional predictors. Syntheses produced comparative tables, a human–AI diagnostic workflow diagram, and explicit alignment of ML applications with each clinical stage to highlight integration points and gaps.
Keywords: Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity; Machine learning; Decision support techniques; Diagnosis; Algorithms
TOP