courses-img1News
International Respiratory Medicine Conference 2024 JEMP2024 NextGen Omics US 2025 A Topic Collection Dedicated to JEMP 2024 9th Asian Conference on Civil, Material and Environmental Science The 4th Climate, Weather and Water Forum International Conference of the German Society for Plant Sciences Emerging concepts and Novel Mechanisms in Organ Fibrosis Workshop ECB-IBS 2024 Five Editors-in-Chief Featured in the List of "Highly Cited
Sign in Register Submit

Journals Article Details

Nature Anthropology-logo
Submit to Nat. Anthropol.
Review Open Access

Human Mobility in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean during Hellenistic and Roman Times: The Potential and Limitations of Bioarchaeological Research

Nature Anthropology. 2024, 2(2), 10005; https://doi.org/10.35534/natanthropol.2024.10005
Efthymia Nikita *   
Science and Technology in Archaeology and Culture Research Centre, The Cyprus Institute, Konstantinou Kavafi Street, 2121 Aglantzia, Cyprus
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 28 Mar 2024    Accepted: 11 Apr 2024    Published: 15 Apr 2024   

Full-Text HTML Full-Text PDF Download PDF

Abstract

This paper offers a review of bioarchaeological research on human mobility during the Hellenistic and Roman period in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean. This period was marked by significant connectivity amidst the establishment of major political entities. The paper begins with an overview of bioarchaeological methods used to study past mobility, including biodistance, isotopic and ancient DNA analyses. It then examines published studies that have utilized these methods to explore mobility during the Hellenistic and Roman periods. The paper concludes by critically assessing the current research limitations and proposing directions for future studies. These suggestions emphasize the importance of conducting additional research to investigate human mobility in neglected areas, as well as at different temporal and spatial scales. Integrating mobility data with other sources of evidence, such as historical accounts, paleoenvironmental data and osteobiographic information is another important future direction of research. Finally, relevant research should be more theoretically informed and its contemporary implications should be effectively communicated within and beyond the academic community. An enhancement of our understanding of the nature and impact of mobility is crucial in today’s society, where misconceptions linking immigration to the decline of the Roman Empire can perpetuate biases against contemporary mobility. 

Keywords

Paleomobility; Isotopes; Ancient DNA; Biodistance; Greco-Roman

References

1.
Tilly C. Migration in Modern European History. In Human Migration. Patterns and Policies; Adams Bloomington: London, UK, 1978; pp. 48–72.
2.
de Ligt L, Tacoma LE. Approaching Migration in the Early Roman Empire. In Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 1–22.
3.
Archibald ZH. Mobility and Innovation in Hellenistic Economies: The Causes and Consequences of Human Traffic. In The Economies of Hellenistic Societies, Third to First Centuries BC; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011; pp. 42–65.
4.
Roselaar ST. State-Organised Mobility in the Roman Empire: Legionaries and Auxiliaries. In Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 138–157.
5.
Woolf G. Movers and Stayers. In Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 438–461.
6.
Woolf G. The Roman Mediterranean as a Fluid System. In Mediterranean Flows: People, Ideas and Objects in Motion; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 1–16.
7.
Bruun C. Tracing Familial Mobility: Female and Child Migrants in the Roman West. In Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 176–204.
8.
Loman P. Mobility of Hellenistic Women. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 2004.
9.
Prowse TL. Isotopes and Mobility in the Ancient Roman World. In Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 205–233.
10.
Lampinen AJ. Condemning Mobility: Nativist and Exclusionist Rhetoric in the Second-Century “Sophistic” Discourse on Human Movement. In Mediterranean Flows: People, Ideas and Objects in Motion; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 45–70.
11.
Cresswell T. Towards a Politics of Mobility. Environ. Plann. D 2010, 28, 17–31. [Google Scholar]
12.
Stojanowski CM. Biodistance. In The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, US, 2018; pp. 1–3.
13.
Rathmann H, Perretti S, Porcu V, Hanihara T, Scott GR, Irish JD, et al. Inferring Human Neutral Genetic Variation from Craniodental Phenotypes. PNAS Nexus 2023, 2, 217. [Google Scholar]
14.
Relethford JH. Biological Distances and Population Genetics in Bioarchaeology. In Biological Distance Analysis; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 623–633.
15.
Pilloud MA, Hefner JT. Biological Distance Analysis: Forensic and Bioarchaeological Perspectives; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016.
16.
Irish JD. The Mean Measure of Divergence: Its Utility in Model‐Free and Model‐Bound Analyses Relative to the Mahalanobis D2 Distance for Nonmetric Traits. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2010, 22, 378–395. [Google Scholar]
17.
Nikita E, Nikitas P. Measures of Divergence for Binary Data used in Biodistance Studies. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2021, 13, 40. [Google Scholar]
18.
Mahalanobis PC. On the Generalized Distance in Statistics. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India 1936, 2, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
19.
Konigsberg LW. Analysis of Prehistoric Biological Variation Under a Model of Isolation by Geographic and Temporal Distance. Hum. Biol. 1990, 62, 49–70. [Google Scholar]
20.
Nikita E. A Critical Review of the Mean Measure of Divergence and Mahalanobis Distances Using Artificial Data and New Approaches to the Estimation of Biodistances Employing Nonmetric Traits. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2015, 157, 284–294. [Google Scholar]
21.
Gower JC. A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of its Properties. Biometrics 1971, 857–871
22.
Fernandes R, Jaouen K. Isotopes in Archaeology. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2017, 9, 1305–1306. [Google Scholar]
23.
Price TD, Frei KM, Tiesler V, Gestsdóttir H. Isotopes and Mobility: Case Studies with Large Samples. In Population Dynamics in Prehistory and Early History. New Approaches Using Stable Isotopes and Genetics; DeGruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 311–322. 
24.
Pederzani S, Britton K. Oxygen Isotopes in Bioarchaeology: Principles and Applications, Challenges and Opportunities. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2019, 188, 77–107. [Google Scholar]
25.
Chen J, Chen J, Zhang XJ, Peng P, Risi C. A Century and a Half Precipitation Oxygen Isoscape for China Generated Using Data Fusion and Bias Correction. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 185. [Google Scholar]
26.
Darling WG, Bath AH, Talbot JC. The O and H Stable Isotope Composition of Freshwaters in the British Isles. 2. Surface Waters and Groundwater. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 7, 183–195. [Google Scholar]
27.
Bentley AR. Strontium Isotopes from the Earth to the Archaeological Skeleton: A Review. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 2006, 13, 135–187. [Google Scholar]
28.
Bataille CP, Crowley BE, Wooller MJ, Bowen GJ. Advances in Global Bioavailable Strontium Isoscapes. Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. 2020, 555, 109849. [Google Scholar]
29.
Montgomery J. Passports from the Past: Investigating Human Dispersals Using Strontium Isotope Analysis of Tooth Enamel. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2010, 37, 325–346. [Google Scholar]
30.
Feuillâtre C, Beaumont J, Elamin F. Reproductive Life Histories: Can Incremental Dentine Isotope Analysis Identify Pubertal Growth, Pregnancy and Lactation? Ann. Hum. Biol. 2022, 49, 171–191. [Google Scholar]
31.
Maggiano CM, White CD, Stern RA, Peralta JS, Longstaffe FJ. Oxygen Isotope Microanalysis Across Incremental Layers of Human Bone: Exploring Archaeological Reconstruction of Short Term Mobility and Seasonal Climate Change. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2019, 111, 105028. [Google Scholar]
32.
Nikita E, Mardini M, Mardini M, Degryse P. SrIsoMed: An Open Access Strontium Isotopes Database for the Mediterranean. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2022, 45, 103606. [Google Scholar]
33.
Quinn RL, Prizzi M, Godfrey L, Setera JB. From the Piedmont to the Coast: LA‐ICP‐MS 87Sr/86Sr Evidence for Short‐Term, Long‐Distance Mobility in the American Southeast. Archaeometry 2020, 62, 1009–1027. [Google Scholar]
34.
Bruun C. Water, Oxygen Isotopes, and Immigration to Ostia-Portus. J. Rom. Archaeol. 2010, 23, 109–132. [Google Scholar]
35.
Brettell R, Montgomery J, Evans J. Brewing and Stewing: The Effect of Culturally Mediated Behaviour on the Oxygen Isotope Composition of Ingested Fluids and the Implications for Human Provenance Studies. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2012, 27, 778–785. [Google Scholar]
36.
Alonzi E, Pacheco-Forés SI, Gordon GW, Kuijt I, Knudson KJ. New Understandings of the Sea Spray Effect and its Impact on Bioavailable Radiogenic Strontium Isotope Ratios in Coastal Environments. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 33, 102462. [Google Scholar]
37.
Böhlke JK, Horan M. Strontium Isotope Geochemistry of Groundwaters and Streams Affected by Agriculture, Locust Grove, MD. Appl. Geochem. 2000, 15, 599–609. [Google Scholar]
38.
Koptekin D, Yüncü E, Rodríguez-Varela R, Altınışık NE, Psonis N, Kashuba N, et al. Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Human Mobility Patterns in Holocene Southwest Asia and the East Mediterranean. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, 41–57. [Google Scholar]
39.
Schmid C, Schiffels S. Estimating Human Mobility in Holocene Western Eurasia with Large-Scale Ancient Genomic Data.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2218375120. [Google Scholar]
40.
Pala M, Olivieri A, Achilli A, Accetturo M, Metspalu E, Reidla M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA Signals of Late Glacial Recolonization of Europe from Near Eastern Refugia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90, 915–924. [Google Scholar]
41.
Skourtanioti E, Ringbauer H, Gnecchi Ruscone GA, Bianco RA, Burri M, Freund C, et al. Ancient DNA Reveals Admixture History and Endogamy in the Prehistoric Aegean. Nat. Ecol. Evolut. 2023, 7, 290–303. [Google Scholar]
42.
Yang MA, Fan X, Sun B, Chen C, Lang J, Ko YC, et al. Ancient DNA Indicates Human Population Shifts and Admixture in Northern and Southern China. Science 2020, 369, 282–288. [Google Scholar]
43.
Arensburg B, Smith P. Appendix: The Jewish Population of Jericho 100 BC-70 AD. In: Hachlili R, Killebrew A, Jewish Funerary Customs During the Second Temple Period, in the Light of the Excavation at the Jericho Necropolis. Palest. Explor. Q. 1983, 115, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
44.
Smith P, Zias J. Skeletal Remains from the Late Hellenistic French Hill Tomb. Israel Explor. J. 1980, 30, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
45.
Arensburg B, Goldstein MS, Nathan H, Rak Y. Skeletal remains of Jews from the Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine Periods in Israel: I. Metric Analysis. B. Mem. Soc. Anthro. Par. 1980, 7, 175–186. [Google Scholar]
46.
Goldstein MS, Arensburg B, Nathan H. Skeletal Remains of Jews from the Hellenistic and Roman Periods in Israel, II. Non-Metric Morphological Observations. B. Mem. Soc. Anthro. Par. 1980, 7, 279–295. [Google Scholar]
47.
Billy G. La Population de Douch (Oasis de Kharga, Égypte) à l’Epoque Romaine. B. Mem. Soc. Anthro. Par. 1992, 4, 111–126. [Google Scholar]
48.
Manzi G, Santandrea E, Passarello P. Dental Size and Shape in the Roman Imperial Age: Two Examples from the Area of Rome. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1997, 102, 469–479. [Google Scholar]
49.
Rubini M, Bonafede E, Mogliazza S. The Population of East Sicily During the Second and First Millennium BC: The Problem of the Greek Colonies. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 1999, 9, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
50.
Brin I, Ben-Bassat Y, Smith P. Craniofacial Morphology of Jews from the Hellenistic Period. Int. J. Anthropol. 1992, 7, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
51.
Henneberg M, Henneberg RJ, Ciarallo A. Skeletal Material from the House of C Iulius Polybius in Pompeii, 79 AD. Hum. Evolut. 1996, 11, 249–259. [Google Scholar]
52.
Irish JD. Who Were the Ancient Egyptians? Dental Affinities Among Neolithic Through Postdynastic Peoples. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2006, 129, 529–543. [Google Scholar]
53.
Nikita E, Mattingly D, Lahr MM. Sahara: Barrier or Corridor? Nonmetric Cranial Traits and Biological Affinities of North African Late Holocene Populations. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2012, 147, 280–292. [Google Scholar]
54.
Nikita E, Mattingly D, Lahr MM. Three-Dimensional Cranial Shape Analyses and Gene Flow in North Africa During the Middle to Late Holocene. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2012, 31, 564–572. [Google Scholar]
55.
Haddow SD. Dental Morphological Analysis of Roman Era Burials from the Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt. PhD Thesis, University College London, London, UK, 2012. 
56.
Kindschuh SC. “Between Two Worlds”: A Biological Distance Study of an Egyptian Frontier Population. PhD Thesis, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA, 2015.
57.
Godde K, Jantz RL. Evaluating Nubian Population Structure from Cranial Nonmetric Traits: Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Population History of the Nubian Nile Valley. Hum. Biol. 2017, 89, 255–279. [Google Scholar]
58.
Cirak A, Arihan SK, Erkman AC, Cirak MT. Epigenetic Features of Human Skulls from Datca-Burgaz Excavations. Mediterr. Archaeol. Ar. 2014, 14, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
59.
Sołtysiak A, Bialon M. Population History of the Middle Euphrates Valley: Dental Non-Metric Traits at Tell Ashara, Tell Masaikh and Jebel Mashtale. Syria. Homo 2013, 64, 341–356. [Google Scholar]
60.
Sheridan SG, Ullinger J, Ramp J. Anthropological Analysis of the Human Remains from Khirbet Qumran: The French Collection. Archaeol. Qumran 2003, 2, 133–173. [Google Scholar]
61.
Hens SM, Ross AH. Cranial Variation and Biodistance in Three Imperial Roman Cemeteries. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 2017, 27, 880–887. [Google Scholar]
62.
Sulosky Weaver CL. The Bioarchaeology of Classical Kamarina: Life and Death in Greek Sicily; University of Florida Press: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2015. 
63.
Harper NK, Tung TA. Burial Treatment Based on Kinship? The Hellenistic–Roman and Venetian-Period Tombs in the Malloura Valley. In Crossroads and Boundaries: The Archaeology of Past and Present in the Malloura Valley, Cyprus; American Schools of Oriental Research: Chicago, IL, USA, 2012; pp. 247–258.
64.
Nikita E, Schrock C, Sabetai V, Vlachogianni E. Bioarchaeological Perspectives to Diachronic Life Quality and Mobility in Ancient Boeotia, Central Greece: Preliminary Insights from Akraiphia. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 2019, 29, 26–35. [Google Scholar]
65.
Eroğlu S. The Frequency of Metopism in Anatolian Populations Dated from the Neolithic to the First Quarter of the 20th Century. Clin. Anat. 2008, 21, 471–478. [Google Scholar]
66.
Nagar Y, Torgeë H. Biological Characteristics of Jewish Burial in the Hellenistic and Early Roman Periods. Israel Explor. J. 2003, 53, 164–171. [Google Scholar]
67.
Boutin AT, McClellan WR, Cusimano DA. Life and Death at Tell En-Nasbeh: A Bioarchaeological Analysis. In “As for Me, I Will Dwell at Mizpah …”: The Tell En-Nasbeh Excavations after 85 Years; Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 31–58.
68.
Al-Shorman A, El-Khouri L. Strontium Isotope Analysis of Human Tooth Enamel from Barsinia: A Late Antiquity Site in Northern Jordan. Archaeol. Anthrop. Sci. 2011, 3, 263–269. [Google Scholar]
69.
Perry MA, Coleman D, Delhopital N. Mobility and Exile at 2nd Century AD Khirbet edh‐Dharih: Strontium Isotope Analysis of Human Migration in Western Jordan. Geoarchaeology 2008, 23, 528–549. [Google Scholar]
70.
Wong M, Brandt JR, Ahrens S, Jaouen K, Bjørnstad G, Naumann E, et al. Pursuing pilgrims: Isotopic investigations of Roman and Byzantine mobility at Hierapolis, Turkey. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018, 17, 520–528. [Google Scholar]
71.
Dupras TL, Schwarcz HP. Strangers in a Strange Land: Stable Isotope Evidence for Human Migration in the Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2001, 28, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar]
72.
Prowse T, Schwarcz H, Garnsey P, Knyf M, Macchiarelli R, Bondioli L. Isotopic Evidence for Age-Related Immigration to Imperial Rome. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007, 132, 510–519. [Google Scholar]
73.
Killgrove K. Migration and Mobility in Imperial Rome. PhD Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2010. 
74.
Killgrove K. Biohistory of the Roman Republic: The Potential of Isotope Analysis of Human Skeletal Remains. Post-Class. Archaeol. 2013, 3, 41–62. [Google Scholar]
75.
Milella M, Gerling C, Doppler T, Kuhn T, Cooper M, Mariotti V, et al. Different in Death: Different in Life? Diet and Mobility Correlates of Irregular Burials in a Roman Necropolis from Bologna (Northern Italy, 1st–4th century CE). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2019, 27, 101926. [Google Scholar]
76.
Stark RJ. Ancient Lives in Motion: A Bioarchaeological Examination of Stable Isotopes, Nonmetric Traits, and Human Mobility in an Imperial Roman Context (1st–3rd c. CE). PhD Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, USA, 2016. 
77.
Stark RJ, Emery MV, Schwarcz H, Sperduti A, Bondioli L, Craig OE, et al. Dataset of Oxygen, Carbon, and Strontium Isotope Values from the Imperial Roman Site of Velia (ca. 1st-2nd c. CE), Italy. Data Brief 2021, 38, 107421. [Google Scholar]
78.
Stark RJ, Emery MV, Schwarcz H, Sperduti A, Bondioli L, Craig OE, et al. Imperial Roman Mobility and Migration at Velia (1st to 2nd c. CE) in southern Italy. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 30, 102217. [Google Scholar]
79.
Prowse TL, Barta JL, von Hunnius TE, Small AM. Stable Isotope and Mitochondrial DNA Evidence for Geographic Origins on a Roman Estate at Vagnari (Italy). J. Rom. Archaeol. 2010, 78, 175–198. [Google Scholar]
80.
Emery M. Assessing Migration and Demographic Change in pre-Roman and Roman Period Southern Italy Using Whole-Mitochondrial DNA and Stable Isotope Analysis. PhD Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, USA, 2017.
81.
Emery MV, Stark RJ, Murchie TJ, Elford S, Schwarcz HP, Prowse TL. Mapping the origins of Imperial Roman workers (1st-4th century CE) at Vagnari, Southern Italy, using 87Sr/86Sr and δ18O variability. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2018, 166, 837–850. [Google Scholar]
82.
Emery MV, Duggan AT, Murchie TJ, Stark RJ, Klunk J, Hider J, et al. Ancient Roman Mitochondrial Genomes and Isotopes Reveal Relationships and Geographic Origins at the Local and Pan-Mediterranean Scales. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018, 20, 200–209. [Google Scholar]
83.
Cilli J. Influence of the Roman Road Network on the Biological Proximity of Italic Abruzzo Populations Through Mean Measure of Divergence Analysis. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2021, 13, 214. [Google Scholar]
84.
Mardini M, Badawi A, Zaven T, Gergian R, Nikita E. Bioarchaeological Perspectives to Mobility in Roman Phoenicia: A Biodistance Study Based on Dental Morphology. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2023, 47, 103759. [Google Scholar]
85.
Kalenderian V, Snoeck C, Palstra SW, Nowell GM, Seif A. Migration and Mobility in Roman Beirut: The Isotopic Evidence. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2023, 49, 104044. [Google Scholar]
86.
Dotsika E, Tassi M, Karalis P, Chrysostomou A, Michael DE, Poutouki AE, et al. Stable Isotope and Radiocarbon Analysis for Diet, Climate and Mobility Reconstruction in Agras (Early Iron Age) and Edessa (Roman Age), Northern Greece. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 498. [Google Scholar]
87.
Reitsema LJ, Kyle B, Koҫi M, Horton RN, Reinberger KL, Lela S, et al. Bioarchaeological evidence for ancient human diet and migration at Epidamnus/Dyrrachion and Apollonia in Illyria, Albania. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2022, 14, 87. [Google Scholar]
88.
Fiorin E, Moore J, Montgomery J, Lippi MM, Nowell G, Forlin P. Combining dental calculus with isotope analysis in the Alps: New evidence from the Roman and medieval cemeteries of Lamon, Italy. Quat. Int. 2023, 653, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
89.
Tepgec F, Görgülü M. The Mitochondrial Origins of the Hellenistic Individuals of Ayasuluk Hill. Experimed 2022, 12, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
90.
Modi A, Lancioni H, Cardinali I, Capodiferro MR, Rambaldi Migliore N, Hussein A, et al. The Mitogenome Portrait of Umbria in Central Italy as Depicted by Contemporary Inhabitants and Pre-Roman Remains. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10700. [Google Scholar]
91.
De Angelis F, Veltre V, Romboni M, Di Corcia T, Scano G, Martínez-Labarga C, et al. Ancient Genomes from a Rural Site in Imperial Rome (1st–3rd cent. CE): A Genetic Junction in the Roman Empire. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2021, 48, 234–246. [Google Scholar]
92.
Antonio ML, Gao Z, Moots HM, Lucci M, Candilio F, Sawyer S, et al. Ancient Rome: A Genetic Crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean. Science 2019, 366, 708–714. [Google Scholar]
93.
Lazaridis I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Acar A, Açıkkol A, Agelarakis A, Aghikyan L, et al. A genetic probe into the ancient and medieval history of Southern Europe and West Asia. Science 2022, 377, 940–951. [Google Scholar]
94.
Salesse K, Dufour É, Balter V, Tykot RH, Maaranen N, Rivollat M, et al. Far from Home: A Multi-Analytical Approach Revealing the Journey of an African-Born Individual to Imperial Rome. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2021, 37, 103011. [Google Scholar]
95.
Mardini M, Nikita E. Biodistance in the Roman World. In Roman Bioarchaeology; University Press Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2025.
96.
Stojanowski CM. Ancient Migrations: Biodistance, Genetics, and the Persistence of Typological Thinking. In Bioarchaeologists Speak Out: Deep Time Perspectives on Contemporary Issues; Springer: Cham, Switzerland; 2019; pp. 181–200.
97.
Nikita E. Biodistance Studies in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: An Overview and Future Prospects. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 34, 102647. [Google Scholar]
98.
Nikita E, Mardini M, Mardini M, Tsimopoulou C, Karligkioti A. Bi(bli)oArch: An Open-Access Bibliographic Database for Human Bioarchaeological Studies in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2021, 39, 103151. [Google Scholar]
99.
Stojanowski CM, Buikstra JE. Research Trends in Human Osteology: A Content Analysis of Papers Published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2005, 128, 98–109. [Google Scholar]
100.
Lagia Α, Papathanasiou A, Triantaphyllou S. The State of Approaches to Archaeological Human Remains in Greece. In Archaeological Human Remains: Global Perspectives; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 105–126.
101.
Gregoricka LA. Moving Forward: A Bioarchaeology of Mobility and Migration. J. Archaeol. Res. 2021, 29, 581–635. [Google Scholar]
102.
Buikstra JE, DeWitte SN, Agarwal SC, Baker BJ, Bartelink EJ, Berger E, et al. Twenty‐first Century Bioarchaeology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Am. J. Biol. Anthropol. 2022, 178, 54–114. [Google Scholar]
103.
Rouard X. Did indo-european languages stem from a trans-eurasian original language? An interdisciplinary approach. Sci. Culture 2022, 8, 15–49. [Google Scholar]
104.
Poblome EC. The Linguistic Situation in the Western Provinces of the Roman Empire. In Band 29/2. Teilband Sprache und Literatur; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1983; pp. 509–553. 
105.
Sheridan SG. Bioarchaeology in the Ancient Near East: Challenges and Future Directions for the Southern Levant. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2017, 162, 110–152. [Google Scholar]
106.
Hakenbeck S. Potentials and Limitations of Isotope Analysis in Early Medieval Archaeology. Post-Class. Archaeol. 2013, 3, 109–125. [Google Scholar]
107.
Webster GS. Culture History: A Culture-Historical Approach. In Handbook of Archaeological Theories; AltaMira Press: Lanham, MD, USA, 2008; pp. 11–27.
108.
Binford LR. Some Comments on Historical versus Processual Archaeology. Southwest. J. Anthropol. 1968, 24, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
109.
Hodder I. Postprocessual Archaeology. Adv. Archaeol. Method Theory 1985, 8, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
110.
Harris OJ, Cipolla C. Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives; Routledge: London, UK, 2017.
111.
Van Oyen A. Actor-Network Theory’s Take on Archaeological Types: Becoming, Material Agency and Historical Explanation. Camb. Archaeol. J. 2015, 25, 63–78. [Google Scholar]
112.
Witmore C. Archaeology and the New Materialisms. J. Contemp. Archaeol. 2014, 1, 203–246. [Google Scholar]
113.
Gosden C. Postcolonial Archaeology. Archaeol. Theory Today 2012, 2, 251–266. [Google Scholar]
114.
Saltini Semerari G, Kyle B, Reitsema L. Perils, Potential and Perspectives of Bioarchaeological Analyses in the Study of Mediterranean Mobility. J. Mediterr. Archaeol. 2021, 34, 84. [Google Scholar]
Creative Commons

© 2024 by the authors; licensee SCIEPublish, SCISCAN co. Ltd. This article is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).